Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-28 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Thijs Kinkhorst, 27.01.2007 19:11 |=- > On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 00:08 +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: >>> IMHO, this is something that makes 3.7.2.0 and 3.7.2.2 two non-equal >>> Policy versions. I wonder why wasn't this 3.7.3.0 instead? >> Hmmm... ma

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-27 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 00:08 +0100, Florent Rougon wrote: > > IMHO, this is something that makes 3.7.2.0 and 3.7.2.2 two non-equal > > Policy versions. I wonder why wasn't this 3.7.3.0 instead? > > Hmmm... maybe because the "should" in 3.7.2.0 was actually obviously a > "must" for security reasons?

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Florent Rougon
Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 3.7.2.2Oct 2006 > * Maintainer scripts must not be world writeable (up from a > should to a must) [6.1] > > IMHO, this is something that makes 3.7.2.0 and 3.7.2.2 two non-equal

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi, > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: >> * There are open bugs in the bts for softbeep, which have no response >> yet, and might have some merit. Have you looked at the bugs? Can they >> be fixed in this upload? If not, you could respond to the reporters >> w

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -=| Thijs Kinkhorst, 26.01.2007 15:18 |=- > * I personally think that "3.7.2.2" is too precise for a > standards-version, since the last part should not make any difference > for a package. I suggest to keep only the significant "3.7.2" part. It

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Hello, On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > * There are open bugs in the bts for softbeep, which have no response > yet, and might have some merit. Have you looked at the bugs? Can they > be fixed in this upload? If not, you could respond to the reporters > why

Re: RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
Hi Ahmed, On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 14:21 +0200, Ahmed El-Mahmoudy wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-17 > of my package "softbeep". Thanks for taking care of an orphaned package! It looks generally ok, but I've got the following comments/questions: * There are open bugs in

RFS: softbeep (updated package)

2007-01-26 Thread Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.3-17 of my package "softbeep". It builds these binary packages: softbeep - System bell replacement The package is lintian clean. The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s