Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Frisch wrote:
[...]
NOTE: This package has been previously uploaded by
Székelyi Szabolcs c...@mail.3d.hu.
A request for sponsorship had been filed but development stalled in late
2010. For more information, read:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a reviewer sponsor for my package sonic-visualiser.
* Package name: sonic-visualiser
Version : 1.9-1
Upstream Author : Chris Cannam and Queen Mary, University of London
* URL : http://www.sonicvisualiser.org/
* License :
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to admit I haven't figured out how to distribute ChangeLog
properly. My google-fu is failing me. I'd like to get rid of the
override. Also, like
Hello,
Bill Cox, le Mon 18 Apr 2011 11:03:16 -0400, a écrit :
Ok, I've installed git2cl, and updated the mkorig script to create
ChangeLog, and uploaded a new version of the package. I still install
it with an override, but I think this package is ready for a sponsor
to upload.
Any
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
Ok, good. You also need to document it in debian/copyright, else
ftpmaster will frown upon it: debian/copyright has to mention the exact
licence of all files.
Done.
BTW I guess you can replace the
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Bill Cox waywardg...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to admit I haven't figured out how to distribute ChangeLog
properly. My google-fu is failing me. I'd like to get rid of the
override. Also, like some other projects, like speech-dispatcher, I'm
keeping the log in
Thanks, this is great. I've uploaded a new version of the package to
debian-mentors which includes changes based on your feedback.
Comments below.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Hello,
Bill Cox, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 15:52:55 -0400, a écrit :
I am
Hello,
Bill Cox, le Fri 15 Apr 2011 14:08:25 -0400, a écrit :
Done. All Eloquence and voxin files have been removed. All .flac
files have been moved to samples, and are verified to be in the public
domain, and documented as such in the doc/README file.
Ok, good. You also need to document it
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sonic.
* Package name: sonic
Version : 0.1.14-1
Upstream Author : Bill Cox (me)
* URL : http://dev.vinux-project.org/sonic/
* License : LGPL v2.1
Section : sound
It builds these binary
Hello,
Bill Cox, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 15:52:55 -0400, a écrit :
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sonic.
Err, didn't you see my comments on your package back in january? Here
they are again:
- I'm afraid the samples/ directory should be dropped from the .orig
tarball: as I understand
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sonic.
* Package name: sonic
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Bill Cox (this is a native package - the author and
maintainer are the same)
* URL : http://vinux-project.org/gitweb/?p=sonic.git;a=summary
* License
Am 17.12.2010 19:38, schrieb Bill Cox:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package sonic.
* Package name: sonic
Version : 0.1.9
Upstream Author : Bill Cox (this is a native package - the author and
maintainer are the same)
This is no reason to declare the package
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
This is no reason to declare the package as an native one.
Yes - a native package is one that does not make sense outside the
Debian distribution.
Your package builds in a clean chroot, but the binary packages
produced have a few
Am 17.12.2010 20:59, schrieb Bill Cox:
Hi, Patrick. Thanks for the feedback. Can you describe when to use
quilt vs native? My google-fu is failing me in this matter.
Please keep it on-list.
native is only correct, if the source is only useful for Debian.
In my case, I wrote and maintain
Am 17.12.2010 20:59, schrieb Bill Cox:
In my case, I wrote and maintain both the code and debian directory,
so I see no need for me to use the quilt patch system, though I do use
it in maintaining other packages for Vinux.
Thanks,
Bill
Hi Bill,
Please take a look at [1], and a little
15 matches
Mail list logo
