On Monday 23 May 2011 09:23:27 Ury Stankevich wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Package looks good, though I'd like to:
1) drop quilt from Build-Depends.
Hi,
i'm not really sure if i should drop quilt from Build-Depends, since
one tine patch
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source format if
you don't have patch/unpatch logic in your debian/rules; they are applied on
unpack phase. This is your case, hence I pointed you to FAQ #2.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Ury Stankevich ury...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source format if
you don't have patch/unpatch logic in your debian/rules; they are
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 11:17:56 Ury Stankevich wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Ury Stankevich ury...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:25 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net
wrote:
You don't need to build-depend on 'quilt' with '3.0 (quilt)' source
format if you don't
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:29 AM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
Package looks good, though I'd like to:
1) drop quilt from Build-Depends.
Hi,
i'm not really sure if i should drop quilt from Build-Depends, since
one tine patch still here.
(yes, i made a bit of mess here: patch 10* is
On Thursday 19 May 2011 16:54:15 Ury Stankevich wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
As a start your debian/changelog does not mention that a patch was
dropped since it has been applied upstream. It is not a big deal in that
particular case, but
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 7:42 PM, George Danchev danc...@spnet.net wrote:
As a start your debian/changelog does not mention that a patch was dropped
since it has been applied upstream. It is not a big deal in that particular
case, but changelog entries are meant to be read by a much broader
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.6-1
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
On Wednesday 18 May 2011 16:11:36 Ury Stankevich wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.6-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I will have a closer look in the next few days unless anyone else sponsor it
in
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-4
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
On Thursday 28 April 2011 13:55:29 Ury Stankevich wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
The upload would fix these bugs: 624351
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.3-4.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Good [1].
Uploaded. Thanks! (JFTR: you
On Friday 25 February 2011 09:32:30 Ury Stankevich wrote:
Dear mentors,
Hi,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/stx-btree/stx-btree_0.8.3-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in c++, doxygen
Hi Ury,
Ury Stankevich wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.8.3-3
of my package stx-btree.
It builds these binary packages:
stx-btree-demo - b+tree implementation in c++, demo program
stx-btree-dev - b+tree implementation in c++
stx-btree-doc - b+tree implementation in
2010/11/26 Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org:
Just one quick remark:
Have a look at your debian/patches/debian-changes-0.8.3-3, I don't think
it does what you intended to do (it creates
10_fix-configure-wxwindows.diff and series in stx-btree-0.8.3/patches/).
yes, my fault
now i had fixed
16 matches
Mail list logo
