RFS: throttle

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". * Package name: throttle Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : James Klicman * URL : * License: GPL 2 or later Section : utils It builds these binary packa

RFS: throttle

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". * Package name: throttle Version : 1.1-1 Upstream Author : James Klicman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://klicman.org/throttle/ * License : GPL 2 or later Section : utils It builds

RFS: throttle

Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". * Package name: throttle Version : 1.2-1 Upstream Author : James Klicman * URL : http://klicman.org/throttle/ * License : GPL Section : utils It builds these binary packages: thrott

Re: RFS: throttle

Kartik Mistry wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". ... > throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe The cstream package (already in Debian) seems to provide the same feature. Can you please look at it and check whether throttle has some unique features so that it makes sens

Re: RFS: throttle

On 7/22/07, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kartik Mistry wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". ... > throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe The cstream package (already in Debian) seems to provide the same feature. Can you please look at it and check whether t

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:04]: > On 7/22/07, Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Kartik Mistry wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "throttle". > >... > >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe > > > >The cstream package (already in Debian) se

Re: RFS: throttle

On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe > > > >The cstream package (already in Debian) seems to provide the same > >feature. Can you please look at it and check whether throttle has > >some unique features so that it makes sense to have both t

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:17]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe [...] > As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options > written in mind with simple use. While, cstream has lots of op

Re: RFS: throttle

On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe [...] > As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options > written in mind with simple use. While, cstream has lots of options > available to configure your need. Did you look at tr

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:41]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe > >[...] > >> As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options > >> written in mind with simple use. While, cstream has

Re: RFS: throttle

On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Did you look at trickle? > > Hmm. Looks simple/good too. > > Should I withdraw ITP? Yes I think so, maybe with a short comment so people can see Dear All, I am taking this RFS back. Also, ITP is retitle back to RFP. Cheers, --

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 19:33]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Did you look at trickle? > >> > >> Hmm. Looks simple/good too. > >> > >> Should I withdraw ITP? > > > >Yes I think so, maybe with a short comment so people can see > > I am taking

Re: RFS: throttle

On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am taking this RFS back. Also, ITP is retitle back to RFP. Why retitling it to RFP if there is no need for a package? Hi, May be someone can found it useful at later stage and can package it. Cheers, -- ---

Re: RFS: throttle

This looks like a candidate for inclusion/merging into moreutils. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: throttle

All'incirca Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:22:59 +0200, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto: > Hi, > * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:17]: > > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe > [...] > > As I said, thro

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi again. On Apr 09 2009, Eduardo Ferro wrote: > * License : GPL Just saying that it is GPL isn't enough. > It builds these binary packages: > throttle - Bandwidth limiting pipe Some people require the short description to start with a lowercase letter, where possible. This would be a

Re: RFS: throttle

Rogério Brito writes: > Some people require the short description to start with a lowercase > letter, where possible. This would be a case. More accurately: The synopsis should work when used inside a sentence like “ is a ”; this means the synopsis should only start with an uppercase letter if t

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi! I just upload a new version. I think that this version fixes all the issues you have comment, but I accept (very pleased) changes for the long description (my English is poor and I don't know how to improve the package description) Lot of thanks for the comments > Hi again. > > On Apr 09 200

Re: RFS: throttle

On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Eduardo Ferro wrote: I just upload a new version. I think that this version fixes all the (I really have no say in this, I'm just curious.) [1] explicitly mentions cstream as a bandwidth-limiting pipe already in Debian. Another program with such functionality is pv (also

Re: RFS: throttle

On Apr 09 2009, Ben Finney wrote: > Rogério Brito writes: > > Some people require the short description to start with a lowercase > > letter, where possible. This would be a case. > > More accurately: The synopsis should work when used inside a sentence > like “ is a ”; Yes. > this means the sy

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, Eduardo. On Apr 09 2009, Eduardo Ferro wrote: > I just upload a new version. I think that this version fixes all the > issues you have comment, but I accept (very pleased) changes for the > long description (my English is poor and I don't know how to improve > the package description) Much be

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi. In fact, I don't know anything about the other programs, I only was looking for a little utility with a RFP to begin to contribute to debian and throttle seems usefull and very easy to package So, I don't know if throttle is better than the other two, My motivation is learn debian develop

Re: RFS: throttle

[Please don't top-post. Instead, remove quoted material that you're not replying to, and reply inline to the points you're responding to.] On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 03:48:38PM +0200, Eduardo Ferro wrote: > Hi! > > I just upload a new version. I think that this version fixes all the > issues you hav