On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 01:25:19PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On 02/01/16 01:34, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:20:19PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> >> On 01/01/16 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> >> I remember this, but is a NEWS file still qualified as the classic
> >> changel
On 02/01/16 01:34, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:20:19PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
>> On 01/01/16 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> I remember this, but is a NEWS file still qualified as the classic
>> changelog?
>
> imho, yes.
I almost expect dh_installchangelogs to look for N
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 06:20:19PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On 01/01/16 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I remember this, but is a NEWS file still qualified as the classic
> changelog?
imho, yes.
> >> Updated the source, deleted the old tag (for now), and uploaded again on
> >> mentors.
please
On 01/01/16 18:07, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> See policy 12.7:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-changelogs
I remember this, but is a NEWS file still qualified as the classic
changelog?
As an author, I no longer distribute classical changelogs (fetch it from
the VCS if you ne
Assume that the original package source tree is at the
specified directory rather than the top level
directory of the Debian source package tree.
> I'm also a bit thorn about the dh_installchangelogs override.
> I now install NEWS with the re
On 01/01/16 01:32, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I'd rather look up where you got the .orig.tar.gz file, gbp doesn't
> really deal with it here.
Even when pristine-tar is enabled?
pristine-tar isn't [yet] in this case, as I used import-dscs.
> I mean, of course I'm just going to use the one already in
On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 01:22:53AM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On 01/01/16 01:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > though, I'm not satisfied yet:
> > * the orig.tar.gz you used to build this release is different than the
> > one in the archive. it's bigger. I haven't checked why, but I just
> > can'
On 01/01/16 01:12, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> though, I'm not satisfied yet:
> * the orig.tar.gz you used to build this release is different than the
> one in the archive. it's bigger. I haven't checked why, but I just
> can't upload it.
I suspect because my connection is flaky, and had to dput
control: tag -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 05:55:06PM +0100, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend"
sure :)
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> This is a packaging refresh, using the latest dh/standars-versions.
so cool this one :)
>
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend"
* Package name: trend
Version : 1.2-2
Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia
* URL : http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/trend
* License : LGPL-2.1
Sect
> Dear mentors,
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1
> of my package "trend".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would fix these bugs: 556503
>
> The pa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.2-1
of my package "trend".
It builds these binary packages:
trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these bugs: 556503
The package can be found on mentors.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-3
of my package "trend", which should fix build dependencies on all
architectures.
It builds these binary packages:
trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-2
of my package "trend".
It builds these binary packages:
trend - a general-purpose, efficient trend graph
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.
In article
<85c01b290908152319ye68a74cg7afbaeb6e8f34...@mail.gmail.com>,
Kartik Mistry wrote:
> > One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail:
>
> You can also use LDTP aka Linux Desktop Testing Project. Package is
> available in Debian and upstream is very well supportive.
In article <20090816070114.ga3...@jwilk.net>,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >make[1]: warning: jobserver unavailable: using -j1. Add `+' to parent
> >make rule.
> >make[1]: warning: -jN forced in submake: disabling jobserver mode.
>
> I guess it's rather an instance of this bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org
* Paul Wise , 2009-08-16, 14:42:
debian/rules doesn't handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt or
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N (see debian-policy).
Fixed.
I've also overridden CXXFLAGS, first to enforce that -Wall is always
present, and to push optimization levels to -O3 (the extra optimization
performe
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> debian/rules doesn't handle DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=noopt or
>> DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=N (see debian-policy).
>
> Fixed.
>
> I've also overridden CXXFLAGS, first to enforce that -Wall is al
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>> Unfortunately no. I would have no idea how to test a 100% graphical
>> application.
>
> One option (which I never got around to evaluating) is Dogtail:
You can also use LDTP aka Linux Desktop Testing Project. Package is
available in Debian and
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> IIRC debian policy recommends compiling with -Wall, but trend is not
>> compiled that way.
>
> Should I add these flags manually in debian/rules?
The usual way is to set CFLAGS in debian
Yuri D'Elia writes:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:27 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> > One more thing, is there a non-interactive test suite? This would be
> > useful to ensure that it works on all the platforms where it builds.
>
> Unfortunately no. I would have no idea how to test a 100% graphical
> a
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:27 +0800
> Paul Wise wrote:
>> One more thing, is there a non-interactive test suite? This would be
>> useful to ensure that it works on all the platforms where it builds.
>
> Unfortunately no. I would have no idea ho
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Yuri D'Elia
> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend".
>
> A review of the source, binary packages and upstream code:
<...>
I've updated the package, which is available here:
http:
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:00:04 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> debian/examples can be reduced to one line: examples/*
Neat.
> The upstream code is LGPLv2+ but the Debian packaging is GPLv3 only,
> was that intentional? Generally it is recommended to keep the same
> license as upstream for the Debian pac
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:38:27 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> > There are no security threats that the package can expose directly.
> > This is a simple, non-setuid program. There are no configuration
> > files with permission issues. No files are ever created directly.
> > No network connections are est
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend".
A review of the source, binary packages and upstream code:
The configure/configure-stamp targets don't do anything so they can
probably be removed, unless you switch upstream from plain make
Good work!
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> qemubuilder looked promising for testing all the archs at once, but
> failed to work for me (bug #441043).
Bummer. Apparently qemu 0.11 will be much better in terms of arch
support, so you might consider re-trying that later when
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:58:59 +0800
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Yuri D'Elia
> wrote:
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend".
>
> Which of the things I wrote in private mail did you take action on and
> which actions did you take for each of them?
First,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend".
Which of the things I wrote in private mail did you take action on and
which actions did you take for each of them?
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "trend".
* Package name: trend
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Yuri D'Elia
* URL : http://www.thregr.org/~wavexx/software/trend/
* License : LGPL
Section : utils
It builds these binary packag
Hi all, I've been a debian user for years now and want to get involved
more seriously. As a starting point, I'm looking sponsorship for a small
(single executable) new package called "trend".
[from the package]
Description: a general-purpose, efficient trend graph for "live" data
trend is a ge
31 matches
Mail list logo
