Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr".
* Package name: ustr
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : James Antill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.and.org/ustr/
* License : LGPL, BSD, MIT
Section : libs
It builds these binar
> * Package name: ustr
> Version : 1.0.1-1
> Upstream Author : James Antill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.and.org/ustr/
> * License : LGPL, BSD, MIT
> Section : libs
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library:
Hi,
thanks for your suggestions first.
> Hi,
>
> I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor etc.
>
> I checked your package, it builds in pbuilder, is lintian clean and it
> looks good. Some random remarks:
>
> * Linda says:
>
> $ linda ustr_1.0.1-1_i386.changes
> W: libustr-1.0-1; The library libustr
Hi,
first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
work for building proper library packages.
You also want to read
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html
and
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
After reading t
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:07:16 +0100
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
> work for building proper library packages.
Bunkum!!!
CDBS is fine for all packages if the maintainer chooses to use it.
I maintain a c
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:07:16 +0100
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
>> work for building proper library packages.
>
> Bunkum!!!
:)
> CDBS is fine for all packages if the maint
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:07:16PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
> work for building proper library packages.
Must mention, that cdbs uses debhelper for almost everything.
> You also want to read
> http://www.ne
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:31:44PM +, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:07:16 +0100
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
> > work for building proper library packages.
>
> Bunkum!!!
:
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:46:00 +0100
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:07:16 +0100
> > Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> first thing I can recommend: Don't use cdbs for that. That just doesn't
> >> work for build
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:53:54AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Václav Ovsík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > thanks for your suggestions first.
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am not a DD, so I cannot sponsor etc.
> >>
> >> I checked your package, it builds in pbuilder, is lintian clean and i
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:20:21AM +0100, Václav Ovsík wrote:
>...
> Q2: Has libustr-debug-1.0.so.1.0.1 a sense without debugging symbols?
> That is assertions and reports by library are in most cases worth even
> without further inspection using gdb that can to step into library.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 10:06:42AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Václav Ovsík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 10:53:54AM -0400, James Antill wrote:
> >
> > My intention was similar, first version of ustr source package builds
> > into:
> >
> > libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-1
of my package "ustr".
It builds these binary packages:
libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library: shared library
libustr-1.0-1-dbg - Micro string library: debugging symbols
libustr-dev - Micro string library: development stuff
libust
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.3-2
of my package "ustr".
It builds these binary packages:
libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library: shared library
libustr-1.0-1-dbg - Micro string library: debugging symbols
libustr-dev - Micro string library: development stuff
li
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.4-2 of my package
"ustr". The package ustr is present in Debian since Lenny (1.0.4-1) for
a long time without update.
It builds these binary packages:
libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library: shared library
libustr-1.0-1-dbg - Micro st
Václav Ovsík wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-1
> of my package "ustr".
I neither checked your package very carefully, nor am I a DD - but here
are my comments:
- read http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-libraries
again. On the f
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> V.ANaclav OvsNmk wrote:
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.2-1
>> of my package "ustr".
>
> I neither checked your package very carefully, nor am I a DD - but here
> are my comments:
Well I'm not trying to pac
James Antill wrote:
> Hmm, I doubt Vaclav changed the Makefile and I'm pretty sure that
> isn't the case in the upstream Makefile.
> Note that it builds 4 versions of each file by default that look like:
>
> *-so-dbg.o
> *-so-opt.o
> *-a-dbg.o
> *-a-opt.o
That's good! As I said before - I d
Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> James Antill wrote:
>> That code is basically:
>>
>> extern inline size_t ustr_xi__pow2(int use_big, unsigned char len)
>> {
>> static const unsigned char map_big_pow2[4] = {2, 4, 8, 16};
>> static const unsigned char map_pow2[4] = {0, 1, 2, 4};
>
James Antill wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> James Antill wrote:
>>> That code is basically:
>>>
>>> extern inline size_t ustr_xi__pow2(int use_big, unsigned char len)
>>> {
>>> static const unsigned char map_big_pow2[4] = {2, 4, 8, 16};
>>> static const unsigned char
> I have setup gcc-4.3 from experimental on a sid xen guest.
> The warning is emitted for example on following (simplified) code:
>
> extern inline char func( int arg )
> {
> static const char foomap[4] = {2, 4, 8, 16};
>
> return foomap[arg & 3];
> }
>
> I have red seve
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 05:36:29PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> James Antill wrote:
> > Bernd Zeimetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> James Antill wrote:
> >>> That code is basically:
> >>>
> >>> extern inline size_t ustr_xi__pow2(int use_big, unsigned char len)
> >>> {
> >>> static const
Vaclav Ovsik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have setup gcc-4.3 from experimental on a sid xen guest.
> The warning is emitted for example on following (simplified) code:
>
> extern inline char func( int arg )
> {
> static const char foomap[4] = {2, 4, 8, 16};
>
> return foomap
Ok, I will forward problem to debian-gcc to ask about it.
--
Zito
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
* Package name: ustr
Version : 1.0.4-6
Upstream Author : James Antill
* URL : http://www.and.org/ustr/
* License : LGPL, BSD, MIT
Section :
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
* Added dependency on quilt and include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
in the debian/rules.
^^ why?
also:
-include /usr/share/topgit/tg2quilt.mk
/usr/share/topgit/tg2quilt.mk:
why? you don'
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 06:39:28PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
>
> >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
>
>
>* Added dependency on quilt and include /usr/share/quilt/quilt.make
> in the debian/rules.
>
> ^^ why?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
* Package name: ustr
Version : 1.0.4-5
Upstream Author : James Antill
* URL : http://www.and.org/ustr/
* License : LGPL, BSD, MIT
Section :
Your message dated Wed, 23 Nov 2016 22:41:08 + (UTC)
with message-id <2036895663.1391348.1479940868...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#844773: RFS: ustr/1.0.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #844773,
regarding RFS: ustr/1.0.4-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Your message dated Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:22:05 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#788218: RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #788218,
regarding RFS: ustr/1.0.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ustr"
It builds those binary packages:
libustr-1.0-1 - Micro string library: shared library
libustr-1.0-1-dbg - Micro string library: debugging symbols
libustr-dev - Micro string library
Václav Ovsík writes:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
Does the RC in your subject refer to release critical? If so, what RC
bug does this close?
d
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:44:57AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Václav Ovsík writes:
>
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: important
>
> Does the RC in your subject refer to release critical? If so, what RC
> bug does this close?
You catch me. I search on http://www.debian.org/Bugs
Your message dated Sat, 09 Jun 2012 04:14:13 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: ustr/1.0.4-3 -- enable hardening flags and
multiarch
has caused the Debian Bug report #676218,
regarding RFS: ustr/1.0.4-3 -- enable hardening flags and multiarch
to be marked as done.
This means
34 matches
Mail list logo
