On Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:26:57 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroinstall-injector.
[...]
For some recent articles about Zero Install, see:
Zero Install: An executable critique of native package systems
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:13:19 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:10 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
... Thanks for your explanation. ...
http://0install.net/matrix.html
The one thing I found particularly interesting is:
Conflict-free
If program A requires an old
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:15:22 -0500, Richard Laager wrote:
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:39 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
zeroinstall-injector - run programs by URL
This probably isn't related to getting your package in Debian, so if
this gets to be a larger
On Fri, 2006-10-27 at 11:10 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
... Thanks for your explanation. ...
http://0install.net/matrix.html
The one thing I found particularly interesting is:
Conflict-free
If program A requires an old version of a library, and program B
requires a new version, A and B can
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroinstall-injector.
* Package name: zeroinstall-injector
Version : 0.24-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard
* URL : http://0install.net
* License : LGPL
Section : admin
It builds these binary
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 14:39 +, Thomas Leonard wrote:
It builds these binary packages:
zeroinstall-injector - run programs by URL
This probably isn't related to getting your package in Debian, so if
this gets to be a larger discussion, we might need to take it off list,
but...
This looks
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 20:16:49 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Thomas Leonard wrote:
But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and
python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to be
accepted? I'm not keen on using python-central because most of the apt-get
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006 23:58:58 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Thomas Leonard wrote:
But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and
python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to
be accepted? I'm not keen on using python-central
Thomas Leonard wrote:
But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and
python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to be
accepted? I'm not keen on using python-central because most of the apt-get
failures I've had recently with other packages seem to be
Felipe Sateler wrote:
Thomas Leonard wrote:
But, there also seems to be python-support (dh_pysupport) and
python-central. Would using one of these make my package more likely to
be accepted? I'm not keen on using python-central because most of the
apt-get failures I've had recently with
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 15:15:01 +0100, Thomas Leonard wrote:
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroinstall-injector.
[...]
The package is lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/z/zeroinstall-injector
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package zeroinstall-injector.
* Package name: zeroinstall-injector
Version : 0.21-3
Upstream Author : Thomas Leonard
* URL : http://0install.net/
* License : LGPL
Section : admin
It builds these binary
12 matches
Mail list logo
