On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
>
> In , Hai Zaar
> wrote:
> >I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it
> >may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to
> >put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to colli
In , Hai Zaar
wrote:
>I need separate 1777 directory for locks library of libbash, since it
>may create rather complex file structure there, so I do not want to
>put it to just /tmp or /var/tmp/, since it may lead to collisions with
>files created manually by users
That's a *desire*, not a *need*
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
wrote:
> In , Hai Zaar
> wrote:
>>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi
> wrote:
>>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi
wrote:
>> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var
In , Hai Zaar
wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi
wrote:
>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi
>>>
>>> wrote:
> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during
> boot process? If yes, is there any service in De
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi
>> wrote:
Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
Hai Zaar schrieb:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
write init script
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>
>> Well... does it mean I'll have to create /var/log/dirlocks during boot
>> process? If yes, is there any service in Debian that can create
>> requested files/dirs on boot? (Please do not tell me that I need to
>> write init script to do
Hai Zaar schrieb:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc
I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
Oops... fixed
I: libbash source: build-depends-with
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Hmm there are some new lintian warnings in
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libbash/libbash_0.9.10c-1.dsc
>
>
> I: libbash source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
Oops... fixed
> I: libbash source: build-depends-without-arch-dep
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please.
>> What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks
>> like this example f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> Could you just put the gpl-3 license header to the Files: * part please.
> What for? - I cite it later under separate License: field. It looks
> like this example from DEP, isn't it?:
> Example 2 (recurrent license).
>
> Files: s
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi
>> wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
Will you accept it if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>>>
>> I would welcome this step :)
> Al
2009/5/11 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. :
> In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for
>>> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution.
>>> quote -->
>>
In <20090510233757.gb6...@ime.usp.br>, Rogério Brito wrote:
>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are purely developed for
>> debian, and make no sense being released in another distribution.
>> quote -->
>
>Those packages are used by distributions
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 20:37 -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> > See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> > <-- quote
> > # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
> (...)
> > But linda, lintian, dpkg and some other tools are
Hi there.
I just caught this, and I'm talking about the quote without even reading
its current version.
On May 10 2009, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> <-- quote
> # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
(...)
> But linda, l
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:26 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>>
>
> I would welcome this step :)
All done. Reuploaded.
Please do not upload yet - just tell me if its OK. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> Will you accept it if I rewrite it according to DEP-5?
>
I would welcome this step :)
- --
/*
Mit freundlichem Gruß / With kind regards,
Patrick Matthäi
GNU/Linux Debian Developer
E-Mail: pmatth...@debian.org
patr...@l
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi
>> wrote:
>>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
>> All done:
>> 1. I've decid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.1
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Hai Zaar wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>
>> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
> All done:
> 1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
> is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> I will review it again if (especially the first) both issues are fixed.
All done:
1. I've decided to go for a new release 0.9.10c. The version package
is set to 0.9.10c-1. And I'll do official release (with tarballs,
etc.) as soon we'll d
Hai Zaar wrote:
> Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir
> is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and
> then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian
> dir and proceed?
>
I don't know how you are creating the tarb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> Can you please advice on how to create "orig" package, when debian dir
> is part of the project file-tree? Do I need to checkout sources and
> then just delete debian subdir, pack orig tarball, then restore debian
> dir and proceed?
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> See: http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
> <-- quote
> # When to use a native vs a non-native debian package
>
> You should only use a native Debian package when it is clear that the
> package would only ever be of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
>> * debian/changelog:
>> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
> Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be
> part of the project tree (with all of the consequences I know about
> it). Does n
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> * debian/control:
> - - Out of date standards-version
Fixed
>
> * debian/changelog:
> - - It is wrong, that the package has been made native
Well, I'm the author of the project, and I want to debian dir to be
part of the proje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hai Zaar schrieb:
> It builds these binary packages:
> libbash- a tool that enables bash dynamic-like shared libraries
> libbash-doc - user and developer documentation for libbash
>
> The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
> The upload would
Good day, dear mentors. A week ago I've the RFS about libbash package.
Since noone replied, I'm resending the request.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Hai Zaar
Date: Sun, May 3, 2009 at 1:20 PM
Subject: RFS: libbash
To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking
30 matches
Mail list logo
