Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is in
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is in non-free for other reasons).
I do
Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is in
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that?
Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
(agrep is in non-free for other reasons).
I do
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Oh, excuse me. I
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
Section: non-free/text
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
So you think it doesn't matter wether there's two packages named agrep
in non-free?
What do you mean, two packages named agrep?
Clearly, Luk is seeking a sponsor for his ITA (cf. #201367).
Cheers
T.
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 08:04:12PM +0800, Wang WenRui wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not*
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
--
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
Well I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
Section: non-free/text
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
So what? In the first sentence quoted, in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package
Hi,
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Is this the same as yours?
Best regards
Wang WenRui
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Hi
I am
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is this package.
Huh? This package is *not*
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Please make yourself familiar with some of the ideas behind Debian. (Read the
Social
Contract, DFSG, ...)
agrep is in non-free, non-free is not part of Debian as is explained in the
social
contract
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
There is an agrep package already in Debian:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrepsearchon=namessubword=1version=allrelease=all
Of course it is
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
Well I
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 04:04:46PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Matt Zimmerman [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
mizar:[~] apt-cache show agrep G Section
Section: non-free/text
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-resources.en.html#s4.6.1
So what? In the first sentence quoted, in
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Well I know all this. But I ment I want to have more information how it
will practically go. Does the patent problems have any implication on the
upload (to non-free)?
Yes.
What am I supposed to do with the package or the patent issues?
See if the package
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the patent
issues
On Wednesday of July 16 2003 19:28, Luk Claes wrote:
I am glad there are no software patents in Europe (yet). Does a patent in
the US have any consequences in Europe??
No, US law got nothing to do in any supreme country except US (and thanks
God). Stuff need to be patented on per country
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 06:21:58PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
I am looking for a sponser for agrep
(http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
I am looking for a sponser for agrep
(http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the patent
On Wednesday of July 16 2003 19:28, Luk Claes wrote:
I am glad there are no software patents in Europe (yet). Does a patent in
the US have any consequences in Europe??
No, US law got nothing to do in any supreme country except US (and thanks
God). Stuff need to be patented on per country
35 matches
Mail list logo
