Danny van der Meeren wrote:
> I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is done
automatically.
The only possibility would be, if you have speci
Op ma, 16-10-2006 te 23:49 +0200, schreef Daniel Baumann:
> Danny van der Meeren wrote:
> > I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
>
> You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
> upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is d
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Danny van der Meeren wrote:
>> I'm searching for a sponsor for the amd64 binary package of glimpse
> You know that Debian has autobuilders? You (resp. your sponsor) need to
> upload source + binaries for one architecture, the rest is done
> automatically
Arjan Oosting wrote:
> This was also my first reaction, but it is a package for non-free. IIRC
> those are not autobuild, are they?
they are autobuilt, but need to be whitelisted by aba.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Int
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
sorry for not giving y
> Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
> for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
> > ftp-ssl
> > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
> You
Hallo Cai,
* Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
>
> Anyway
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
"I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll
sent th
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> > and the sources. url?
>
> From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
>
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote:
> ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?""
>
> I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
> place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you w
Hi,
* Cai Qian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040928 20:40]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
sorry for not giving y
> Please don't take that personally, but I guess the situation is similar
> for the people here who are ready to sponsor.
I see, but I wish there will be more people to help, because the DD
application goes on slowly. Anyway, thanks.
> > ftp-ssl
> > ftpd-ssl -- bugs fixed, new maintainer
> You
Hallo Cai,
* Cai Qian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-28 20:51]:
> I am not sure if there is any people want to help, because I asked this
> few days ago. I worked hard to test these packages, and did a lot of
> bugs fixed. However, it make me quite sad that there seems no one to
> help.
>
> Anyway
* Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?
From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
"I have no place for these packages, so please reply me and I'll
sent th
Hello Adeodato,
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-09-29 16:36]:
> * Nico Golde [Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:05:44 +0200]:
> > nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> > and the sources. url?
>
> From http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2004/09/msg00163.html:
>
On Wednesday 29 September 2004 17:15, Cai Qian wrote:
> ""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
> and the sources. url?""
>
> I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
> place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you w
On Sunday, September 30, 2001 4:48 PM +0200 Erich Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats
'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text
files:
[snip]
Do you know "recode"?
recode knows over 200 differ
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 01:12:08PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> --On Monday, October 1, 2001 9:10 AM -0400 Peter S Galbraith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> > $ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> > /usr/bin/todos
> > /usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
At 13:12 -0700 07 Oct 2001, David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> >$ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> >/usr/bin/todos
> >/usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
> Thanks, I've added a conflict line to my package:
There's a clash for tomac as well:
8
David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> First of all, I appreciate the criticism. I've been pondering my eol
> package throughout the week and I've decided it still has merit. It
> is not intended to recode between unicode, ebdic, and ascii, like
> recode. It's merely intende
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
and the sources. url?""
I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want.
Sorry for inconvient.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail invi
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user.
Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org -
http://www.x-privat.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
""nobody will sponsor you if nobody have the chances to review the package
and the sources. url?""
I am sorry to miss the urls to the packages, because I haven't found a
place (10-15M) for them. However, I can send them to you if you want.
Sorry for inconvient.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail invi
> what sizes have the packages got? i am a modem user.
Its orig is 6.9M and Deb pack is 4.3M. I am sorry for these big size.
Regards,
Cai Qian
--
Mail inviata tramite i servizi gratuiti di X-Privat.org - http://www.x-privat.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message pa
On Sunday 22 May 2005 9:38 pm, John Hendrickson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I authored xdm-options
Is that the package you want sponsored and added to Debian?
Have you read the New Maintainers' Guide?
http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/index.en.html
and the list FAQ:
http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/de
On Sunday, September 30, 2001 4:48 PM +0200 Erich Schubert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Description: Translates text files between Mac, DOS, and Unix formats
>> 'eol' contains 4 programs that help you deal with cross-platform text
>> files:
[snip]
> Do you know "recode"?
> recode knows over
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 01:12:08PM -0700, David Caldwell wrote:
> --On Monday, October 1, 2001 9:10 AM -0400 Peter S Galbraith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> > $ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> > /usr/bin/todos
> > /usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
At 13:12 -0700 07 Oct 2001, David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >This will clash with an existing package:
> >
> >$ dpkg -L sysutils | grep todos
> >/usr/bin/todos
> >/usr/share/man/man1/todos.1.gz
>
> Thanks, I've added a conflict line to my package:
There's a clash for tomac as well:
David Caldwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> First of all, I appreciate the criticism. I've been pondering my eol
> package throughout the week and I've decided it still has merit. It
> is not intended to recode between unicode, ebdic, and ascii, like
> recode. It's merely intend
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written in C.
Out of curiosity, what advantages d
Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I need a sponsor.
Hi,
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:35PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> > interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> > written in
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:05:05PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
> Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I would be glad to sponsor you, but I would like to see a complete source
I apologise for the whole mess. KMail resend my whole mutt outbox
yeste
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:43:13 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Out of curiosity, what advantages does it have over gmc's archive support?
> > (I assume Nautilus has something similar as well)
> To be honest, nothing but a more convenient interface. I always feel
> constricted in f
On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget written in C.
Out of curiosity, what advantages
Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I need a sponsor.
Hi,
> The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> written in Python with one widget writte
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 05:51:35PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 01:05:05PM +0200, Danie Roux wrote:
>
> > The program is called garchiver. It's a replacent for WinZip, with two
> > interfaces. The classic WinZip, and then a tree interface. It's a GNOME app,
> > written i
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 10:05:05PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:05:05 +0200
> Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> I would be glad to sponsor you, but I would like to see a complete source
I apologise for the whole mess. KMail resend my whole mutt outbox
yest
Em Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:43:13 +0200
Danie Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > Out of curiosity, what advantages does it have over gmc's archive support?
> > (I assume Nautilus has something similar as well)
> To be honest, nothing but a more convenient interface. I always feel
> constricted in
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> This is my first Debian package.
>
> The bug report for the package is here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
>
> The tentative package files are here:
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Before someone takes the time to look at the BTS and
> savannah, they need to
> be interested in your package. Telling people what
> the package is helps in
> that.
Thanks for the hint. I'm sorry for my poor first try.
Please let me start over.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> The usual description for the RULI package is:
>
> RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
> a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
> resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
> for q
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Looks like an interesting package. Are
> you pushing various
> upstreams to use this library? Does it have PHP,
> Perl, Python, etc
> bindings? (That may be implied by your use of
> liboop, but I'm not familiar
> with that package at
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> records. I'm planning to contact those applications
> (i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
> but I would
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> > I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> > have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> > records. I'm planning to contact those applic
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams)
of
> packages which *could* use SRV records, regardless
of
> whether they currently do or not, and suggest it to
them.
I plan to push that kind of SRV adoption. I have
actually
sent a ruli-based
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
> (GNU GPL)
> plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
> compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
>> which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
>> currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
> I pla
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Text such as the following would be useful in your
> licencing statements:
>
> "Additional to those permissions granted by the GNU
> Public License,
> permission is given to distribute copies of this
> work linked to software
> licenced under the ter
Hi Mentors,
I have added minimum support for both
PHP and Perl into ruli-0.19. The new
Debian packages are uploaded to
mentors.debian.net and are also
available in the usual place:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
I have a signature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
my gpg key. I suppose that is
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 02:38:53PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> This is my first Debian package.
>
> The bug report for the package is here:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=234303
>
> The tentative package files are here:
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Before someone takes the time to look at the BTS and
> savannah, they need to
> be interested in your package. Telling people what
> the package is helps in
> that.
Thanks for the hint. I'm sorry for my poor first try.
Please let me start over.
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:25:05PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> The usual description for the RULI package is:
>
> RULI stands for Resolver User Layer Interface. It's
> a library built on top of an asynchronous DNS stub
> resolver. RULI provides an easy-to-use interface
> for q
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Excellent. Looks like an interesting package. Are
> you pushing various
> upstreams to use this library? Does it have PHP,
> Perl, Python, etc
> bindings? (That may be implied by your use of
> liboop, but I'm not familiar
> with that package at
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> records. I'm planning to contact those applications
> (i.e. their maintainers) as soon as I find them,
> but I would
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 12:42:33PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 07:44:43PM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> > I do intend to push the library, but I actually don't
> > have a map of Debian applications which use SRV
> > records. I'm planning to contact those applic
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams)
of
> packages which *could* use SRV records, regardless
of
> whether they currently do or not, and suggest it to
them.
I plan to push that kind of SRV adoption. I have
actually
sent a ruli-based
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:50:24AM -0300, Everton da Silva Marques wrote:
> I'm unsure on how to apply licensing terms to RULI
> (GNU GPL)
> plus this recently created PHP4-binding. Do we have
> compatibility issues with the PHP license?
Since your library is under the GPL, I presume that the PHP4
On 2004-03-18 Everton da Silva Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd start hitting up the maintainers (and upstreams) of packages
>> which *could* use SRV records, regardless of whether they
>> currently do or not, and suggest it to them.
> I pla
--- Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Text such as the following would be useful in your
> licencing statements:
>
> "Additional to those permissions granted by the GNU
> Public License,
> permission is given to distribute copies of this
> work linked to software
> licenced under the ter
Hi Mentors,
I have added minimum support for both
PHP and Perl into ruli-0.19. The new
Debian packages are uploaded to
mentors.debian.net and are also
available in the usual place:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/ruli/
I have a signature of [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
my gpg key. I suppose that is
Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
--
Alexandre Fayolle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:56:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
People google for "sponsor" and get the list e-mail address. It's a kind of
spam, since they've not done even 10 seconds of research to find out whether
we might be interested, b
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:01:52PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 09:56:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Are these message genuine, or some kind of spam?
>
> People google for "sponsor" and get the list e-mail address. It's a kind of
> spam, since they've not done
On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this is
cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend for CUPS.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a bet
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
>
> Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this
> is cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend fo
Nathaniel W. Turner said:
> Wow, Konversation sure is a great IRC client! It would sure be great
> if it were in Debian What? You think so too? You're a DD?
> Splendid! Consider sponsoring my package:
[...]
> P.S. I was going to put "Single IRC client package seeks caring DD for
> uplo
On Sunday 21 December 2003 04:15, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What is it about konversation which makes it so much better than every
> other IRC client out there?
Well, I know there are more than a few IRC clients out there. =) And while
it may be a stretch to claim it is "so much better than every
On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Ãric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this is cups-pdf, a
PDF writer backend for CUPS.
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 12:09:53PM +0200, Martin-?ric Racine wrote:
> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
The effort involved in going to the bug report and have a good read isn't
likely to be expended if I don't have any interest in the package.
You might get a bet
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On 2004-03-19 10:09:53 + Martin-Éric Racine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all. Feel free to ask any clarification question.
>
> Subject does not say it all. To save others time, I tell the list this
> is cups-pdf, a PDF writer backend fo
Nathaniel W. Turner said:
> Wow, Konversation sure is a great IRC client! It would sure be great
> if it were in Debian What? You think so too? You're a DD?
> Splendid! Consider sponsoring my package:
[...]
> P.S. I was going to put "Single IRC client package seeks caring DD for
> uplo
On Sunday 21 December 2003 04:15, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> What is it about konversation which makes it so much better than every
> other IRC client out there?
Well, I know there are more than a few IRC clients out there. =) And while
it may be a stretch to claim it is "so much better than every
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
submitter 157749 !
thanks
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 21:25, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
Done.I think I did
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > submitter 157749 !
> NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> owner !
>
> This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I don't think owner existe
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> > (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
>
> Oops. I stand
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
operating procedure for RFPs.
$ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 157749 ITP: ...
submitter 157749 !
thanks
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 21:25, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
Done.I think I did
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 09:04:52PM +0100, Arvind Autar wrote:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157749
>
> Go and retitle the bug and set the submitter to yourself as is standard
> operating procedure for RFPs.
>
> $ mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 157749
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > submitter 157749 !
> NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> owner !
>
> This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
Oops. I stand corrected. I don't think owner existe
Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:13:24PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > submitter 157749 !
> > NO. Don't change the submitter. Instead, do:
> > owner !
> >
> > This way, the original submitter will get mail when the bug is closed
> > (ie. the pkg is uploaded).
>
> Oops. I stand
84 matches
Mail list logo
