On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 11:41:06PM +0100, scupake wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I recently packaged bandcamp-dl and I am looking for someone to review
> and sponsor it, it is my first package for a Python program, so there
> might be some mistakes.
> Here's the link: https://salsa.debian.org/Scupake/bandcam
❦ 21 September 2021 15:11 +02, Harald Dunkel:
> I am looking for a sponsor to review the new mg package for Sid,
> as it can be found on https://salsa.debian.org/debian/mg .
Hello,
Can you collapse the two latest changelog entries? 20210314-1 was never
uploaded. Did Tomasz confirmed he was unav
What are the advantages of kt-update over cron-apt and unattended-upgrades?
kt-update allows (me) to remotely manage the various configuration our
machines :
* simple http file servers provide different sources.list which contains
some extra directives (seen as comment for apt-get or aptitude)
* o
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:36 PM Jean-Jacques Brucker wrote:
> I did completely rewrite cron-apt to build a lightweight apt distribution
> manager:
> https://github.com/jbar/kt-update
What are the advantages of kt-update over cron-apt and unattended-upgrades?
> Should I push tag to build it you
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:55 PM Jean-Jacques Brucker wrote:
> "GauSSIan" a light GNU/Linux distribution made only for some of our
> ultrasound machines.
Interesting, I hadn't heard of GauSSIan before and I can't find
anything about it on the web.
I would like to invite you to add GauSSIan to t
"GauSSIan" a light GNU/Linux distribution made only for some of our
ultrasound machines.
Le mar. 16 juil. 2019 à 16:37, Paul Wise a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:36 PM Jean-Jacques Brucker wrote:
>
> > since 1 year we use it on our debian-based distribution.
>
> Which distribution is this
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:36 PM Jean-Jacques Brucker wrote:
> since 1 year we use it on our debian-based distribution.
Which distribution is this referring to?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
what happened with that ?
El jue., 2 de may. de 2019 a la(s) 05:24, escribió:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> (TLWR:
> I have worked on my fisrt package, and am looking for a DD/DM to check it
> and eventually sponsor it into unstable.)
>
> Some time ago I had to compile the latest version of Heimadll (
On 16/01/2018 17:53, Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:37:03PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
>> Hello mentors,
>>
>> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the last trafficserver release.
>>
>> Though I'm listed in package Uploaders, I don't have the right to upload
>> it by myself
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 05:37:03PM +0100, Jean Baptiste Favre wrote:
> Hello mentors,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor to upload the last trafficserver release.
>
> Though I'm listed in package Uploaders, I don't have the right to upload
> it by myself and, unfortunatly, didn't hear from Aron Xu, wh
On 03/08/2016 12:12 PM, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for an NMU to get rid of #767016.
> Somebody with systemd experience would be welcome.
>
PS: I posted a patch in the BTS.
Regards
Harri
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 07:57:18AM +, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> I've created one amd64.deb package. Unfortunately I don't have access
> to other architectures. The pkg can be found here:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/files/spg.0.5.0/spg_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb/download
You need to provide the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Fenio,
I've created one amd64.deb package. Unfortunately I don't have access
to other architectures. The pkg can be found here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/files/spg.0.5.0/spg_0.5.0-1_amd64.deb/download
With regards to sponsoring I was loo
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:40:39AM +, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> My name is Tadeusz Struk. I'm looking for a sponsor for a Small
> Privacy Guard (http://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/)
> This software allows to encrypt/decrypt files as well as
> generate/verify signature of a file.
> It u
Trying again, with a 'filterable' subject :)
Cheers,
Giridhar
On 07/12/21 14:07 +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag said ...
> I am (still) looking for a long-term sponsor for "axel" (v1.0b-7). I
> have had an offer for help since my last request [1] over a month ago,
> but haven't heard back in over
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> OK. How about now?
now, it is good. package uploaded, thanks.
if you want/need further sponsoring, contact me off-list:
http://people.debian.org/~daniel/documents/sponsoring.html#contact
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Resending message to debian-mentors list.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 20:02:38 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon Barnes wrote:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
>
> good, except...
OK. How about now?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
good, except:
* 3.7.2.2 as standards version is over precise, should be only 3.7.2.
* debian/copyright should have a reference to the full license text in
/usr/share/common-licenses; look at e.g
Daniel-
Re: xevil
Ok. I've added a manpage, tested it, added the gpl blurb to the
copyright file, and updated the standards version. I'm ready for you to
test my package.
For your convenience, here is the link to the dsc:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil/xevil_2.02r2-5.dsc
-Bra
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
> specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
> vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
> put it?
in the debian directory, and install it with either a dh
Where do I put the man page? I put it in the debian directory, as
specified in the New Maintainer's Guide. Not specified, exactly, but
vaguely alluded to. Anyway, that didn't work. Where am I supposed to
put it?
-Brandon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Just got back home late Saturday night, and have been settling in. Just
getting back to packaging xevil now.
On Tue, 02 Jan 2007 12:58:06 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
>
> Hi,
>
> what is the current state?
>
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> take your time, enjoy christmas/new year
Hi,
what is the current state?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
> meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
> in debian/copyright? I'll write the man page next. I found an article
> on writing man pages. It looks pretty easy; I just haven'
On 12/18/06, Brandon Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
in debian/copyright?
No, you just need to say the full "This program is free software; you
can mod
Thanks, Daniel. I changed the standards version. I'm not sure what you
meant about the GPL blurb. Did you mean to include the entire GPL text
in debian/copyright? I'll write the man page next. I found an article
on writing man pages. It looks pretty easy; I just haven't done it
before.
I'm going t
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> However, please bump the standards version to the current one, write a
> manpage for 'serverping', and I'm happy to sponsor it.
Oh, and I forgot: Please include the full GPL blurb in debian/copyright,
look at libextractor if unsure.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burg
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> The source is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil
Please include also the URI to the *.dsc file, otherwise I have to fire
up a browser just because of that.
> I can email the binary to anyone who asks. It looks like
> mentors.debian.net doesn't accept bi
Oh yeah. Sorry about that.
The source is at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xevil
I can email the binary to anyone who asks. It looks like
mentors.debian.net doesn't accept binaries.
-Brandon
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 10:18:25 +0100
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brandon B
Brandon Barnes wrote:
> I'm new, so I'll need the help of a sponsor.
Have you an updated package ready? If so, where do we find it?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel
Iustin Pop wrote:
>> * installing README through docs makes not much sense, imho.
> Hmm, not sure about this. You mean using the install rule and not
> binary-arch?
well, README does not contain usefull information, so i think it's not
worthwile to install it into the system. you may remove it f
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 04:35:34PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Iustin Pop wrote:
> > dget http://www.k1024.org/apt/pool/python-pylibacl_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes
>
> * changelog and copyright have a useless empty line at the end of the
> file.
Done
> * for consistency, i suggest to rename
Iustin Pop wrote:
> dget http://www.k1024.org/apt/pool/python-pylibacl_0.2.2-1_amd64.changes
* changelog and copyright have a useless empty line at the end of the
file.
* for consistency, i suggest to rename python-pylibacl.docs to docs.
* installing README through docs makes not much
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 11:42:13PM -0700, Bjorn Hansen wrote:
> Hi,
> I was hoping someone could sponsor and upload my package:
> http://staff.washington.edu/grethel/balder2d_debian/
I see that you have repackaged the upstream tarball. Why was this
necessary? You should detail in README.Debian w
Roger Leigh wrote, Wednesday, February 15, 2006 9:15 PM:
> john aikins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [nothing]
>
> It's customary to provide details of what you would like sponsoring,
> plus pointers to the sources.
Given his messages of two and four days previously, he appears to want
himself s
john aikins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[nothing]
It's customary to provide details of what you would like sponsoring,
plus pointers to the sources.
Regards,
Roger
--
Roger Leigh
Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
Debian GNU/Linux
kang wrote on 26/09/2005 12:03:
> We are currently providing packages for the RSBAC framework
> (http://www.rsbac.org) for Gentoo and Fedora Core.
> We use Debian though, and have debian packages too. We would like if at
> all possible to be able to maintain thoses inside the Debian tree.
Though I
Ben Finney wrote:
>On 15-Aug-2005, Michael Spang wrote:
>
>
>>Thanks Ben Finney and Nico Golde for the suggestion. I have uploaded
>>to mentors.debian.net, so any willing sponsors can find the package
>>from there to examine.
>>
>>
>
>Care to toss us a bone and give the URL to the packages?
On 15-Aug-2005, Michael Spang wrote:
> Thanks Ben Finney and Nico Golde for the suggestion. I have uploaded
> to mentors.debian.net, so any willing sponsors can find the package
> from there to examine.
Care to toss us a bone and give the URL to the packages? :-)
--
\ Eccles: "I just saw
Thanks Ben Finney and Nico Golde for the suggestion. I have uploaded to
mentors.debian.net, so any willing sponsors can find the package from
there to examine.
Thanks,
Michael Spang
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo Michael,
* Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-15 10:06]:
> Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> >>Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper
> >>Description: web developer extension for the Firefox web browser
> >> The Web Developer Firefox extension adds a toolbar with several
> >> features aimed
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 10:16:31PM -0400, Michael Spang wrote:
>
>
>>Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper
>>Description: web developer extension for the Firefox web browser
>> The Web Developer Firefox extension adds a toolbar with several
>> features aimed at web deve
On 14-Aug-2005, Michael Spang wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper
(I echo the sentiments of others, this extension would be a good
addition to Debian)
If you need a place to put your source packages (which is what
potential sponsors need to examine), this site is exactly what you
need:
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 22:16 -0400, Michael Spang wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper
> Description: web developer extension for the Firefox web browser
> The Web Developer Firefox extension adds a toolbar with several
> features aimed at web developers.
> I'm willing to maintain eithe
On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 10:16:31PM -0400, Michael Spang wrote:
> Package: mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper
> Description: web developer extension for the Firefox web browser
> The Web Developer Firefox extension adds a toolbar with several
> features aimed at web developers.
>
> (Upstream: https://a
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:47:29PM +0200, Geoffroy Carrier wrote:
> I'm Geoffroy Carrier, a student from Grenoble, France.
> I've been using Debian GNU/Linux for years, and I (nearly) always wanted
> to become a maintainer.
>
> I have been reading all the important documentation these days: that's
Thanks a lot for caring :) I already fixed this, bruno barrera told me about
it.
Thanks :)
On Tuesday 18 January 2005 00:14, David Sawyer wrote:
> It looks like there are a few man pages missing (buffer, mt, cpio).
> Try changing the following in the debian/rules file...
>
> 64c64
> < dh
It looks like there are a few man pages missing (buffer, mt, cpio).
Try changing the following in the debian/rules file...
64c64
< dh_installmanpages mt.1 cpio.1 buffer.1
---
> dh_installman tpqic02-support-1.9b/mt.1 tpqic02-support-1.9b/cpio.1
> tpqic02-support-1.9b/buffer.1
David
Yes, sorry, there it is :
http://eternityos.free.fr/debian/
Thank you :)
On Monday 17 January 2005 18:19, Bruno Barrera C. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 14:19, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
> > Hi, i am working on the package hwtools, it was orphaned and been
> > maintained by the QA team
Hello,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 14:19, Pierre Ancelot wrote:
> Hi, i am working on the package hwtools, it was orphaned and been maintained
> by the QA team since it was orphaned the 21 Sep 2003.
> I wrote some man pages and corrected some craps.
>
> I'm looking for someone to check my work and upl
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:38:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[...]
> which seems to be used elsewhere. I thought lintian enforced this,
> but I can't seem to find it in the code. I'm opening a couple bugs
> now we speak.
Well the problem is that dh_make had wrong template few weeks ago.
I fi
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:10:18PM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:13:29PM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > > How does your package differ from konwert?
> > > Has it got some advantages?
> >
> - Your copyright file still doesn't look as it should.
> Take a look a
Patrzę w ekran, a to Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo pisze do mnie:
> - If upstream uses configure stuff, then why are you patching
> Makefile.in and similar files? Can't you just use --prefix=/usr ?
I do. However files installed by upstream have wrong permissions. That's
why I fix it.
> - Your copyrig
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:13:29PM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > How does your package differ from konwert?
> > Has it got some advantages?
>
> These two packages have very similar functionality. I dont know konwert
> very well so I cannot tell much about differences between these two
> packages
Patrze w ekran, a to Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo pisze do mnie:
> How does your package differ from konwert?
> Has it got some advantages?
These two packages have very similar functionality. I dont know konwert
very well so I cannot tell much about differences between these two
packages. I thing th
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> Currently I would like to add some of my packages to Debian. The first one
> should be polcnv - Polish diacritics conventer, a tool simmilar to recode
> but much easier to use.
Hi Maciek.
How does your package differ from konwert?
Patrzę w ekran, a to David Moreno Garza pisze do mnie:
> Great work.
Thanks ;)
> Besides, what exactly is this file?
> /usr/share/doc/polcnv/LICENCJA-GNU.gz
This is Polish translation of the GPL licence file. It was included in the
upsource.
I have corrected the glitches you have mentioned. Wo
On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 10:20 +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am a happy Debian user for about a year now. I have made several custom
> packages for the software I could not find in debian. Please tak a look
> at "http://phys.p.lodz.pl/~maciek/debian unstable main contrib non-fr
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 21:48, Manoj Srivastava escribió:
> At this point, I have not seen the OP do anything that they
> ought not to have done, and I have no idea what circumstances they
> were dealing with -- they may not have a choice about the OS/MUA at
> this point. We sho
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 21:48, Manoj Srivastava escribió:
> At this point, I have not seen the OP do anything that they
> ought not to have done, and I have no idea what circumstances they
> were dealing with -- they may not have a choice about the OS/MUA at
> this point. We sho
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:49:56PM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
>
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter of taste or
> technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs. thunderbird...), it's a
> matter of commitment with free software.
Hmmm? Do you really t
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 03:49:56PM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
>
> About Outlook: it's propietary software. For me it's not a matter of taste or
> technichal reasons (mutt vs. kmail vs. evolution vs. thunderbird...), it's a
> matter of commitment with free software.
Hmmm? Do you really t
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:19:17 +0200, Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
>> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>> >
>> > Really, I don't want to fl
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:19:17 +0200, Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
>> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
>> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>> >
>> > Really, I don't want to fl
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 15:25, martin f krafft escribió:
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I am also not complaining
> that you use KMail, am I? I think it's bloat and does not provide
> some important features. No,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:35:56PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
> debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not on the ports page,
> and I can't seem to find any resources on the 'net that date past about 1997.
I don't
On Thursday 21 October 2004 14:25, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client.
To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 15:19 +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> > >
> > > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
> >
> > Who cares? Probably that works for him.
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1519 +0200]:
> It's propietary software that runs only in a propietary OS, in
> which is pretty hard to create Debian packages. ;-)
Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses su
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Who cares? Probably that works for him.
--
David Moreno Garz
"Gokhan YESILYURT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My name is Gokhan YESILYURT from University of Michigan, Nuclear
> Engineering and Radiological Sciences. I have been working on
> debugging of the Cosign web login software for a long time so that I
> can prepare a debian package of this open source
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 15:25, martin f krafft escribió:
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I am also not complaining
> that you use KMail, am I? I think it's bloat and does not provide
> some important features. No,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 02:35:56PM +0100, David Given wrote:
> To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
> debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not on the ports page,
> and I can't seem to find any resources on the 'net that date past about 1997.
I don't
On Thursday 21 October 2004 14:25, martin f krafft wrote:
[...]
> Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
> Windows, and second... it's a mail client.
To change the subject slightly, does anyone know what happened to
debian-win32? The mailing list seems to be dead, it's not
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 15:19 +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> > > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> > >
> > > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
> >
> > Who cares? Probably that works for him.
also sprach Alejandro Exojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.21.1519 +0200]:
> It's propietary software that runs only in a propietary OS, in
> which is pretty hard to create Debian packages. ;-)
Chill. First, it is trivial to create Debian packages even on
Windows, and second... it's a mail client. I
El Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2004 14:53, David Moreno Garza escribió:
> On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
> >
> > Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> > "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses su
On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 09:03 +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> > X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
>
> Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
> "want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Who cares? Probably that works for him.
--
David Moreno Garz
"Gokhan YESILYURT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My name is Gokhan YESILYURT from University of Michigan, Nuclear
> Engineering and Radiological Sciences. I have been working on
> debugging of the Cosign web login software for a long time so that I
> can prepare a debian package of this open source
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
"want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Really fun :)
Anyway, good luck for your sponsor search, that's not that easy to find
one.
Alexis.
* Gokhan YESILYURT ([EMAI
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Really, I don't want to flame but I cannot resist to point out that a
"want-to-be" Debian Maintainer uses such a mailer...
Really fun :)
Anyway, good luck for your sponsor search, that's not that easy to find
one.
Alexis.
* Gokhan YESILYURT ([EMAI
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1202 +0200]:
> . The first point is the 100% debconf use for configuration.
I am not sure I find this a good thing.
> Tell me if I'm wrong.
I am sure you are not. I personally do not see the benefit of the
software, but then again, I am
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
> ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
> or even greater functionality.
flexbackup :
- no debconf use for configuration (really not userfriendl
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1011 +0200]:
> That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer
> questions and that's it.
I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
or
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1202 +0200]:
> . The first point is the 100% debconf use for configuration.
I am not sure I find this a good thing.
> Tell me if I'm wrong.
I am sure you are not. I personally do not see the benefit of the
software, but then again, I am
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> > I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> > backup-manager.
That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer questions
and that's it.
You'll be
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> backup-manager.
How does this differ from backup2l or faubackup, flexbackup, or even
just plain tar+savelog+cron?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
> ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
> or even greater functionality.
flexbackup :
- no debconf use for configuration (really not userfriendl
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1011 +0200]:
> That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer
> questions and that's it.
I am not opposed to your package, but have you looked at the other
ones I quoted? Some of them are equally simple and provide the same
or
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) disait :
> also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> > I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> > backup-manager.
That's a userfriendly one. Just install the package, answer questions
and that's it.
You'll be
also sprach Alexis Sukrieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.13.1001 +0200]:
> I've packaged a small-but-useful piece of software called
> backup-manager.
How does this differ from backup2l or faubackup, flexbackup, or even
just plain tar+savelog+cron?
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I
On Sunday 03 October 2004 04:23, Estêvão Valadão wrote:
> Hi, my name is Estךvדo, i'm a Linux systems
> administrator and i really want to join the Debian
> Team.
> I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm
> looking for a sponsor to begin the process.
> Thanks for the atention.
>
> Bes
On Sunday 03 October 2004 04:23, EstÃvÃo ValadÃo wrote:
> Hi, my name is Est×v×o, i'm a Linux systems
> administrator and i really want to join the Debian
> Team.
> I wanna develop the ipautofw package, and i'm
> looking for a sponsor to begin the process.
> Thanks for the atention.
>
> Bes
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 20:20, Dirk Prösdorf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the unrar-nonfree.
s/unrar/unace/
> The Debian packages can
> you find on http://www.proesdorf.de/uploads/unace-nonfree/.
>
> Some infos about this package. There is a free version of unace in
> Debian
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 20:20, Dirk Prösdorf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the unrar-nonfree.
s/unrar/unace/
> The Debian packages can
> you find on http://www.proesdorf.de/uploads/unace-nonfree/.
>
> Some infos about this package. There is a free version of unace in
> Debian
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:29, james wrote:
> Hello,
> I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
> makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
> new to development.
It generally helps to link to the packages you've created so that
potential sponsor
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 13:29, james wrote:
> Hello,
> I have already built limewire 4.0.6 from the previous verision's
> makefile and would like to maintain. I am looking for a sponsor as I am
> new to development.
It generally helps to link to the packages you've created so that
potential sponsor
* Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-16 22:56:20 +0200]:
> I've packaged jailkit, a collection of tools to create and maintain
> chroot jails. The package is lintian clean. My pgp key is checked by
> some debian developers already, so now I need a sponsor.
This message reminds me of a question
1 - 100 of 230 matches
Mail list logo
