Hello,
Given that I have not received any response to my previous request, and
questions, I'm re-sending this.
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:35 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> >
> > >
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 09:47 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
>
> > Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is
> > partly a RFS, partly a re-review request.
> ...
> > [1]
> > Is this motivation good enough for not usin
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> Hello again, upstream has now released Red Eclipse 1.2 and hence this is
> partly a RFS, partly a re-review request.
...
> [1]
> Is this motivation good enough for not using stand-alone Enet?
Hmm, I don't have a good answer for that.
>
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 14:56 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the review! :)
> I have fixed a bunch of the things pointed out, and tried to justify
> those I have not.
>
> I have marked items which I consider incomplete yet with "###", it's
> either things that I am unsure how
4 matches
Mail list logo
