Hi
[vie, 18 ene 2008 17:43:03 +0100] - Alexander Schmehl:
> Don't know of any reason that would be in favour of one option or an
> other. Out of personal taste, I would recycle the old ITP.
I also think it's better to reuse the old ITP :-)
> Yes, you should. Could be, that there where some pro
Hi!
* Iván Forcada Atienza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080118 16:00]:
> 1) Should I reopen the existing bug [2] or open a new ITP??
Don't know of any reason that would be in favour of one option or an
other. Out of personal taste, I would recycle the old ITP.
> 2) Should I notify the original ITP op
On 2008-01-18, Iván Forcada Atienza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Hi mentors!!
>
> I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found t
Hi mentors!!
I am interested in kgtk application [1]. After a search, I've found that
it was ITP'd time ago, but the bug was automatically closed 365 days
after [2].
Now, I want to start working on it (in fact, it's already packaged
because I needed it, and only missing my sponsor reviewal) but I
4 matches
Mail list logo