On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Also: since gql-drivers is no longer needed, I want to get it off the
> > archive. Is the correct way to file a bug against non-us.debian.org
> > (where gql-drivers resides)?
>
> usually it is ftp.d.o, but in this case non-us
>
> Now there are some open bugs against gql-drivers, which I want to
> close with the upload of the new gql package. Should I reassign them
> to gql and close them from the changelog? (I guess so)
>
looks like you have never had someone accidently close a bug of yours (-:
Just close the bug as
Hi folks!
I had a 'logical' software package consisting of two physical source
packages. Now I have merged them into one source pkg, named after one
of the original source pkgs.
So, concretly, 'gql' and 'gql-drivers' are becoming 'gql' (with gql
containing gql-drivers, of course).
Now there are
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:46:16PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Also: since gql-drivers is no longer needed, I want to get it off the
> > archive. Is the correct way to file a bug against non-us.debian.org
> > (where gql-drivers resides)?
>
> usually it is ftp.d.o, but in this case non-u
>
> Now there are some open bugs against gql-drivers, which I want to
> close with the upload of the new gql package. Should I reassign them
> to gql and close them from the changelog? (I guess so)
>
looks like you have never had someone accidently close a bug of yours (-:
Just close the bug a
Hi folks!
I had a 'logical' software package consisting of two physical source
packages. Now I have merged them into one source pkg, named after one
of the original source pkgs.
So, concretly, 'gql' and 'gql-drivers' are becoming 'gql' (with gql
containing gql-drivers, of course).
Now there are
6 matches
Mail list logo
