Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao: changelog: -- cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high . * Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues. * New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161885) - Don't use and depend on non-free libedc any more

Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
Hello, I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao: changelog: -- cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high . * Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues. * New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161885) - Don't use and depend on non-free libedc any more

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Lukas Geyer
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao: > changelog: > -- > cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues. >* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #1618

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build, > so it will take whatever default the user has. IMHO this is a bug, but > people might disagre

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [NMU of cdrdao] >> Whatever, I think the situation - the version of cdrdao in debian is >> not non-free but illegal - justifies a NMU to DELAYED/9-day. > I think it would even justify an imm

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Lukas Geyer
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file > > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build, > > so it will take whatever default the user h

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Lukas Geyer
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao: > changelog: > -- > cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high > . >* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues. >* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build, > so it will take whatever default the user has. IMHO this is a bug, but > people might disagr

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [NMU of cdrdao] >> Whatever, I think the situation - the version of cdrdao in debian is >> not non-free but illegal - justifies a NMU to DELAYED/9-day. > I think it would even justify an imm

Re: Sponsor for cdrdao NMU

2002-10-11 Thread Lukas Geyer
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote: > > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file > > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build, > > so it will take whatever default the user h