Hello,
I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao:
changelog:
--
cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues.
* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161885)
- Don't use and depend on non-free libedc any more
Hello,
I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao:
changelog:
--
cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
.
* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues.
* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161885)
- Don't use and depend on non-free libedc any more
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao:
> changelog:
> --
> cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues.
>* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #1618
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file
> does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build,
> so it will take whatever default the user has. IMHO this is a bug, but
> people might disagre
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[NMU of cdrdao]
>> Whatever, I think the situation - the version of cdrdao in debian is
>> not non-free but illegal - justifies a NMU to DELAYED/9-day.
> I think it would even justify an imm
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file
> > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build,
> > so it will take whatever default the user h
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
> I am looking for sponsor for a NMU of cdrdao:
> changelog:
> --
> cdrdao (1:1.1.7-0.1) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Urgency high because it fixes copyright issues.
>* New upstream version 1.1.7 (Closes: #161
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file
> does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build,
> so it will take whatever default the user has. IMHO this is a bug, but
> people might disagr
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[NMU of cdrdao]
>> Whatever, I think the situation - the version of cdrdao in debian is
>> not non-free but illegal - justifies a NMU to DELAYED/9-day.
> I think it would even justify an imm
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Lukas Geyer wrote:
> > I have just tried building it and noticed that the debian/rules file
> > does not set CFLAGS or any other environment variables for the build,
> > so it will take whatever default the user h
10 matches
Mail list logo