* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 01:31]:
> > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
> >
> > bullshit
>
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
If you want to join Debian as a package maintainer, there is clearly
no good reason for not having a package in the archive. Only t
* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-29 01:31]:
> > > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
> >
> > bullshit
>
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
If you want to join Debian as a package maintainer, there is clearly
no good reason for not having a package in the archive. Only t
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is
clearly *not* exclusively the case.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
>
> bullshit
>
> Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
> packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for
Thanks for your response--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:47:46AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > So I applied to become a DD, got my key signed and my application
> > verified, and now I am waiting for an AM assignment.
> Make sure you've done your homework. The key is signed, good! Is
> the package l
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
bullshit
Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or
so after I got m
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to
think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't
have a package in the archive, yo
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote:
> I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery
> program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps
> already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other
> people mentio
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 18:31, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> It _is_ so.
> Definitely.
I was approved 7 months ago, with no package in the archive. This is
clearly *not* exclusively the case.
--
Joe Wreschnig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
>
> bullshit
>
> Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
> packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for
Hi,
Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
yes.
You won't be approved with no package in the a
Thanks for your response--
On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:47:46AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > So I applied to become a DD, got my key signed and my application
> > verified, and now I am waiting for an AM assignment.
> Make sure you've done your homework. The key is signed, good! Is
> the package l
Hi,
Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
> unders
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
bullshit
Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or
so after I got m
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
I don't think it is as clear-cut as that, but its probably a good way to
think of it. Probably a better way of looking at it is if you don't
have a package in the archive, yo
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel wrote:
> I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery
> program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps
> already too many image gallery programs in Debian, but, as several other
> people mentio
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
> understand it can take many
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer
process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel.
I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery
program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps
already too
Hi,
Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
yes.
You won't be approved with no package in the a
Hi,
Le Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 04:20:33PM -0400, Adam Kessel écrivait:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
> unders
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:20, Adam Kessel wrote:
> I am wondering if it makes sense to try to find a sponsor to upload my
> package now, or wait to go through the entire DD process before trying to
> include salonify in Debian, or if it really matters which way I go? I
> understand it can take many
I'm a little confused about the timeline of the sponsor vs. developer
process. I have read the relevant documents at debian.org/devel.
I filed an ITP on salonify, bug #201878. Salonify is an image gallery
program. One developer on debian-devel complained that there were perhaps
already too
22 matches
Mail list logo
