Re: Status of wired

2007-05-20 Thread Toby Smithe
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 11:26 +0200, "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm the owner of the ITP. I was discussing with upstream while doing the > packaging and upstream promise to fix al stuff I reported for 0.4 final. > But now upstream seems to be dead and 0.4 has not been released yet. >

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-20 Thread Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm the owner of the ITP. I was discussing with upstream while doing the packaging and upstream promise to fix al stuff I reported for 0.4 final. But now upstream seems to be dead and 0.4 has not been released yet. Feel free to hijack my ITP, I'm

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, May 19, 2007 at 05:18:54PM +0100, Toby Smithe a écrit : > > My next question is this: should I first have the package accepted into > Ubuntu Gutsy before getting it to Debian, or should I do the reverse? Hi, Obviously, it depends of your priorities : a) Getting wired quickly in Ubuntu =

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread Toby Smithe
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 19:57 +0200, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote: > On Saturday 19 May 2007, Toby Smithe wrote: > > My next question is this: should I first have the package accepted into > > Ubuntu Gutsy before getting it to Debian, or should I do the reverse? It > > would be easiest for me to

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
On Saturday 19 May 2007, Toby Smithe wrote: > My next question is this: should I first have the package accepted into > Ubuntu Gutsy before getting it to Debian, or should I do the reverse? It > would be easiest for me to do the former, in my position, but I'm still > unsure as to whether that's th

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread Toby Smithe
On Sat, 2007-05-19 at 18:25 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > Hallo Toby, > > * Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-19 18:19]: > > I noticed an ITP for `wired` on the BTS. I was wondering, since I have > > now adopted this package, what it's status on Mentors was. It doesn't > > seem to be there now

Re: Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread Nico Golde
Hallo Toby, * Toby Smithe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-19 18:19]: > I noticed an ITP for `wired` on the BTS. I was wondering, since I have > now adopted this package, what it's status on Mentors was. It doesn't > seem to be there now, and I have packaged a new version. Should I add to > the old bu

Status of wired

2007-05-19 Thread Toby Smithe
Hi, I noticed an ITP for `wired` on the BTS. I was wondering, since I have now adopted this package, what it's status on Mentors was. It doesn't seem to be there now, and I have packaged a new version. Should I add to the old bug report, or open a new one? The ITP report is #394755. My next quest