On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:49:52PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:56:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:56:37PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the
Hi Michael,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
interested in uploading the package. I have been monitoring this
Michael,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
Hi,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
Steve,
Thanks for your response. I appreciate the time you took to write out
the email. Even a critical response is very valuable. I would like to
address some of the points you made.
I do agree that the support of web apps is not perfect at the moment.
The virtual host problem is probably
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this
should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult
to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest
in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority
will consider
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
to package. The only reason I am looking into packaging this is
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:41:16PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Plenty of web apps do not separate configuration from presentation at
all which tends to make maintenance a nightmare. Streamline however has
only 1 configuration file which has about 5 lines in it that set up the
Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the integration work themselves anyway and won't see any
Hello,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
interested in uploading the package. I have been monitoring this for
Hi,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
interested in uploading the package.
What you describe is the same
Hi Michael,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
interested in uploading the package. I have been monitoring this
Michael,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 03:01:02PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Stephan Beyer wrote:
Hi,
I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting
my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how
to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed
Steve,
Thanks for your response. I appreciate the time you took to write out
the email. Even a critical response is very valuable. I would like to
address some of the points you made.
I do agree that the support of web apps is not perfect at the moment.
The virtual host problem is
I think you're missing the point. It's not that developers think this
should not be packaged. It's that packaging a web app is so difficult
to get right that only developers with a very strong personal interest
in the software would be willing to even look at it. The vast majority
will consider
Brian,
Point taken. But I happen to be the upstream author for this project.
So it's not like I just picked this out of a hat, and it's not like I am
in the position to say, Well maybe I should just pick something easier
to package. The only reason I am looking into packaging this is
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:41:16PM -0400, Michael MacFadden wrote:
Plenty of web apps do not separate configuration from presentation at
all which tends to make maintenance a nightmare. Streamline however has
only 1 configuration file which has about 5 lines in it that set up the
Steve Langasek wrote:
The issue is that providing a package for a webapp that only integrates
with certain webserver packages in Debian splits the userbase between
those who have a reason to want to use your package, and those who have
to do the integration work themselves anyway and won't see
22 matches
Mail list logo
