Hi,
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
1 Month sounds reasonable to me under normal circumstances.
Two months have gone by, and no feedback.
Is there any kind of alternative for these
On 12/16/2010 11:08 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
1 Month sounds reasonable to me under normal circumstances.
Two months have gone by, and
On Thursday 16 December 2010 18:28:33 Luke Faraone wrote:
On 12/16/2010 11:08 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
1 Month sounds reasonable to
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:31:56PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
Why is this important? In this lapse of time of 2 months, my package (1.7.1
version) was already obsoleted (by 1.7.2, with a lot of bug fixes). So I
was wondering if it's worth to invest time in creating a
On 12/16/2010 01:31 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
We're in a freeze. Poking the FTPmasters will not be useful, unless
there's a reason your package should get reviewed before everything else
in the queue. As has been said before, the developer will be notified if
there's a problem
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
I won't poke them to review my package, as if it was the most important
thing in the universe, before anything else. I just wanted to ask about its
status and possible review because my package is
Hello,
I don't know if the question is very appropriate in this list, but since it
will be useful for new maintainers whose packages are uploaded to the
archives, I figured out that it might be appropriate. If not, please point
me to the correct place to ask.
The matter is that I got a new
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
1- If this is normal, or if having to wait for 1 week indicates that the
package has some kind of problem.
It is normal, especially during the freeze. The oldest package in new
has been waiting 11
Dear Manuel,
accumulation of packages in the NEW queue is not uncommon, see:
http://people.debian.org/~corsac/
Although a modest help, you may try to review some packages by yourself when a
public copy is available, for instance on mendors.d.n or a VCS. The maintainers
will probalby have enough
Hi!
/me takes his ftp-assistant hat on.
Am 27.10.2010 15:50, schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
So I am wondering whether my package has a specific problem (though I
was not contacted by ftp masters in any way), [..]
If you have a working e-mail address, we'll contact you, if there is a
Hi
Dne Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:50:16 +0200
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo manuel.montez...@gmail.com napsal(a):
The matter is that I got a new version of an existing package compiled and
uploaded by a sponsor (I'm just DM so I can't directly upload my stuff), and
the package is stuck in the new
Hi again,
Thanks all for your informative and quick replies. You've covered all bases
so I don't have any questions left, just one comment:
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:04:19 Charles Plessy wrote:
Although a modest help, you may try to review some packages by yourself
when a public copy
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
manuel.montez...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been hanging around in this list for a while, I think that I only
reviewed a package once (and replied to one question from your about the
correct way to test man pages :) ). But most of the
13 matches
Mail list logo
