On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
> I won't poke them to review my package, as if it was the most important
> thing in the universe, before anything else. I just wanted to ask about its
> status and possible review because my package is already towards the fro
On 12/16/2010 01:31 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
>> We're in a freeze. Poking the FTPmasters will not be useful, unless
>> there's a reason your package should get reviewed before everything else
>> in the queue. As has been said before, the developer will be notified if
>> there's a pr
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 07:31:56PM +0100, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> Why is this important? In this lapse of time of 2 months, my package (1.7.1
> version) was already obsoleted (by 1.7.2, with a lot of bug fixes). So I
> was wondering if it's worth to invest time in creating a pack
On Thursday 16 December 2010 18:28:33 Luke Faraone wrote:
> On 12/16/2010 11:08 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> >>> 2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
> >>
> >> 1 Month sounds re
On 12/16/2010 11:08 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>>> 2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
>>
>> 1 Month sounds reasonable to me under normal circumstances.
>
> Two months have gone
Hi,
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:24:38 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > 2.1- If so, what's would be the time appropriate to ask? 1 month for
>
> 1 Month sounds reasonable to me under normal circumstances.
Two months have gone by, and no feedback.
Is there any kind of alternative for thes
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:25 AM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
> I've been hanging around in this list for a while, I think that I only
> reviewed a package once (and replied to one question from your about the
> correct way to test man pages :) ). But most of the time it's because the
>
Hi again,
Thanks all for your informative and quick replies. You've covered all bases
so I don't have any questions left, just one comment:
On Wednesday 27 October 2010 16:04:19 Charles Plessy wrote:
> Although a modest help, you may try to review some packages by yourself
> when a public copy
Hi
Dne Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:50:16 +0200
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" napsal(a):
> The matter is that I got a new version of an existing package compiled and
> uploaded by a sponsor (I'm just DM so I can't directly upload my stuff), and
> the package is stuck in the "new" queue of the ftp mas
Hi!
/me takes his ftp-assistant hat on.
Am 27.10.2010 15:50, schrieb Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo:
> So I am wondering whether my package has a specific problem (though I
> was not contacted by ftp masters in any way), [..]
If you have a working e-mail address, we'll contact you, if there is
Dear Manuel,
accumulation of packages in the NEW queue is not uncommon, see:
http://people.debian.org/~corsac/
Although a modest help, you may try to review some packages by yourself when a
public copy is available, for instance on mendors.d.n or a VCS. The maintainers
will probalby have enough
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
wrote:
> 1- If this is normal, or if having to wait for >1 week indicates that the
> package has some kind of problem.
It is normal, especially during the freeze. The oldest package in new
has been waiting 11 months.
> 2- In the lat
Hello,
I don't know if the question is very appropriate in this list, but since it
will be useful for new maintainers whose packages are uploaded to the
archives, I figured out that it might be appropriate. If not, please point
me to the correct place to ask.
The matter is that I got a new ve
13 matches
Mail list logo
