On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 03:23:41PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > (it installed the -dev package from sid because you didn't add a version
> > constraint to require the version from experimental)
>
> Ok, to add a version constraint, is it OK that I use the following to
> replace all libgit2 dependents
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 3:47 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tong Sun
> wrote:
> > ... looking further into all those libgit2 related
> > packages that I've already built, I saw mixed results:
> >
> > -
> > $ dpkg
On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:21:57PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> So I build with experimental build-dep via:
>
> sbuild -s -v -A --no-clean-source -d unstable --extra-repository='deb
> http://deb.debian.org/debian experimental main'
> --build-dep-resolver=aspcud gnuastro
(it installed the -dev package
> > I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
> Then I would expect you to ask the maintainers for coordination and/or
> help.
The maintainer normally actively participates in the discussion here,
and gives people help, but he is super busy at the moment, so I just
want to
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 2:27 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
> Then I would expect you to ask the maintainers for coordination and/or
> help.
>
> > This is the first tim
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 01:19:04PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
Then I would expect you to ask the maintainers for coordination and/or
help.
> This is the first time I'm doing the library transition so I'm
> following the library trans
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 1:05 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:25:19PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > > > PS, here are all libgit2 related packages installed in my system,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > their versions:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > libgit2-1.0:amd64_1.0.0+dfsg.1-1
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:25:19PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > > PS, here are all libgit2 related packages installed in my system, and
> > > > > their versions:
> > > > >
> > > > > libgit2-1.0:amd64_1.0.0+dfsg.1-1
> > > > > libgit2-28:amd64_0.28.5+dfsg.1-1
> > > > > libgit2-build-deps_1.0.0+dfsg
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 12:08 PM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:58:03AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > [skipped as already answered in private
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:58:03AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > [skipped as already answered in private]
>
> Strange, I didn't get anything in private (that's why I'm bumpin
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:50 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> [skipped as already answered in private]
Strange, I didn't get anything in private (that's why I'm bumping it),
just searched everywhere again just now and got nothing.
Would
On Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 03:27:40PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
[skipped as already answered in private]
> One reason I can think of is that, my latest libgit2 is called
> libgit2-1.0 while the *old* one is called libgit2-28, which is in fact
> libgit2 v0.28.5+dfsg.1-1. Which one would debuild pick?
deb
Bump.
Hoping to get a response so that I can make another attempt this week.
Thanks
-- Forwarded message -
Date: Sat, Oct 17, 2020 at 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: Verify the library transition
To: Debian Mentors List
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
> debs with dpkg-deb -f),
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:59 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:41:58AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > > > Also, one dependent of libgit2-dev
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:41:58AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > > Also, one dependent of libgit2-dev is librust-libgit2-sys-dev. and I
> > > > > see
> > > > >
> > > > > $
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:19 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > > Also, one dependent of libgit2-dev is librust-libgit2-sys-dev. and I see
> > > >
> > > > $ grep -B10 libgit2-dev debian/control
> > > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11),
>
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:15:41AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > > Also, one dependent of libgit2-dev is librust-libgit2-sys-dev. and I see
> > >
> > > $ grep -B10 libgit2-dev debian/control
> > > Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11),
> > > dh-cargo (>= 18),
> > > cargo:native ,
> > > rustc:native ,
>
Thanks Andrey.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 8:39 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
> You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
> debs wi
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:30:33AM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> So `libgit2-dev` only shows up once in calligra's debian/control file.
You need to check actual dependencies of binary packages (e.g. by looking at
debs with dpkg-deb -f), not your debian/control.
And libgit2-dev is a development package,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:14 AM Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> > Of all the above 46 newly built binary-only packages, how can I tell
> > which .so from them will link to libgit2-dev, and whether the
> > libgit2-dev version linked is truly
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:55:17PM -0400, Tong Sun wrote:
> Of all the above 46 newly built binary-only packages, how can I tell
> which .so from them will link to libgit2-dev, and whether the
> libgit2-dev version linked is truly v1.0.0? Note this is more a
> generic question and not specific for
I'm currently helping with the library transition for libgit2-dev.
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/libgit2-dev
After hours and hours building, I've just successfully built calligra.
The last few lines of build log are:
-
[ 39%] Building CXX obj
23 matches
Mail list logo
