Hi,
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 06:31:03PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:47:51 +0900
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I know there is a way to do it
>
> ??
dh_gencontrol as I posted in another message.
As I remember, it was used before I adopted the maintenance
On Thu, 02 Oct 2008, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This way user will not be forced to download same package again.
Having the same binary version on the same architecture come from two
different source versions is fundamentally broken.
It behavoir is non-defined in the BTS
You also won't satisfy your des
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:47:51 +0900
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know there is a way to do it
??
On what basis? Which packages? Are you confusing porter uploads
using dpkg-buildpackage -B ?
> but I am not sure if it is a good and
> valid way. I also was not sure where I have seen i
On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 12:10:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Any suggestion for debian/rules ? or pointer to good example.
>
> You can't really do this, AFAIK. You can break the source into 2
> separate source packages that each build one package. That way you
> only up
Hi,
My question is arch:all (not any) ... more specifically,
foo-static_1.0_all.deb is documentation package which does not change
document contents from 1.0 to 1.1 transition.
I know there is a way to do it but I am not sure if it is a good and
valid way. I also was not sure where I have seen
El 02/10/08 12:51 Osamu Aoki escribió:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 12:10:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > Any suggestion for debian/rules ? or pointer to good example.
> >
> > You can't really do this, AFAIK. You can break the source into 2
> > separate source packages t
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose source foo_1.0.tar.gz produces:
> foo-updated_1.0_all.deb
> foo-static_1.0_all.deb
>
> Then with next source foo_1.1.tar.gz with updated contents will produce
> now with normal build script:
> foo-updated_1.1_all.deb (updated from foo-updated_1.0_all.deb)
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 23:35 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Suppose source foo_1.0.tar.gz produces:
> foo-updated_1.0_all.deb
> foo-static_1.0_all.deb
>
> Then with next source foo_1.1.tar.gz with updated contents will produce
> now with normal build script:
> foo-updated_1.1_all.deb (upda
Hi,
Suppose source foo_1.0.tar.gz produces:
foo-updated_1.0_all.deb
foo-static_1.0_all.deb
Then with next source foo_1.1.tar.gz with updated contents will produce
now with normal build script:
foo-updated_1.1_all.deb (updated from foo-updated_1.0_all.deb)
foo-static_1.1_all.deb (same as fo
9 matches
Mail list logo
