On 02/27/2013 06:41 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
Bah, I need to read before sending.
Very nice response Paul, I think it's worth adding to FAQ:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#Why_is_it_so_hard_to_find_sponsor.3F
I've updated "What happens if I can't find a sponsor" as well.
cheers,
Tomek
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> Hi Lenz,
Cheers
>
>
> with time, DDs tend to meet loved ones,
i have too, also I have a couple, just one, not several, and I am
responsible .. a'n my loves use in mayority linux, not window-like
over linux
>
> make children, be promoted
Le Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 01:04:39PM -0430, PICCORO McKAY Lenz a écrit :
>
> I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still
> working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can
> made a fix u ca... u can.. u do that" co DD/DM has no time!! NO TI
in recent years the debian packagers have focused on licensing, setting
aside as much therefore important that the package works ..
I've noticed that some reports have response as "is not critical, is still
working," or else "not reproducible", or better "u can made a patch u can
made a fix u ca..
Hi Paul,
thanks for your great analysis. I might like to stress explicitly one
item (even if I totally agree with all others in general)
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 01:37:10PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Specialization:
>
> Debian contributors generally work on stuff they use or are otherwise
> are i
On 27.02.2013 20:57, Anton Gladky wrote:
>> First - a weighted sponsorship priority queue - all packages get a
>> rating and higher-rated packages will get sponsored sooner than others.
>
> I agree with that. On my opinion the package "weight" should be
> calculated, considering the following par
On 27/02/13 19:57, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi all,
my 2 cts.
On 02/27/2013 12:07 AM, Philip Ashmore wrote:
First - a weighted sponsorship priority queue - all packages get a
rating and higher-rated packages will get sponsored sooner than others.
I agree with that. On my opinion the package "wei
On 02/26/2013 10:36 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> it is currently during freeze, most DDs are working on RC
> bugs :)
If only this was truth! :)
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
Hi all,
my 2 cts.
On 02/27/2013 12:07 AM, Philip Ashmore wrote:
>
> First - a weighted sponsorship priority queue - all packages get a
> rating and higher-rated packages will get sponsored sooner than others.
I agree with that. On my opinion the package "weight" should be
calculated, considerin
I'm reminded of the metrics stuff that was discussed ages ago:
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsNet#Metrics
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:07:11PM +, Philip Ashmore wrote:
> On 26/02/13 21:51, Arno Töll wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
> >>I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
> >>But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
>
Bah, I need to read before sending.
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Specialization:
...
> Unfortunately can mean
Unfortunately this can mean there are no sponsors for particular areas.
> Preferences:
>
> Different folks have different packaging preferences, some like cdbs,
Here is a hopefully comprehensive, general answer to this question,
not specific to your situation:
Freeze:
During the release freeze, most Debian folks are focussed on getting
the release out. Fixing RC bugs, fixing important bugs, doing upgrade
testing, writing release notes, finalising the ins
On 26/02/13 21:51, Arno Töll wrote:
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
Be patient and don't give up. I know this can be frustrating and
annoying, and w
Hi,
On 26.02.2013 22:31, W. van den Akker wrote:
> I understand [1] and [2]. I meant uploading to unstable and not testing.
> But none of the DD was ever answering the emails..
Be patient and don't give up. I know this can be frustrating and
annoying, and we're slowly trying to improve the si
> If I am reading your (big) changelogs correctly, you are (amongst other
> things) switching patch-system to quilt, and package new upstream
> versions - This is a big no-no for the release team during the freeze
> (see [1]) which we have had since June [2].
>
> This might lower the chances of g
> While this isn't true of the general case, which I think there's valid
> concern about, it is currently during freeze, most DDs are working on RC
> bugs :)
Ok.
>
> Some sponsorship does still go on -- perhaps you could ask some of the
> DDs who maintain jabber servers -- the ejabberd folks or
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:09:04 +0100,
Willem van den Akker wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
>http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
>http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
>
>But until now nobody seemed to be interested in sponsoring
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:09:04PM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
>
> But until now nobody seemed to be interested i
Hi,
I have 2 packages for which I request sponsoring.
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabberd2 Bug #698547
http://mentors.debian.net/package/jabber-muc Bug #698548
But until now nobody seemed to be interested in sponsoring them.
I got messages not familiar with these packages or something
20 matches
Mail list logo
