Paul Wise writes:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Olе Streicher wrote:
>> This would be an option, as long as there is not complaint that an
>> arch-independent package should be generated identically regardless of
>> the architecture it is built on :-)
> At some point we want the entire archi
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Olе Streicher wrote:
> This would be an option, as long as there is not complaint that an
> arch-independent package should be generated identically regardless of
> the architecture it is built on :-)
At some point we want the entire archive to be reproducibly bui
Andreas Metzler writes:
> Olе Streicher wrote:
>> My question here is now how strict it is to have identical files in
>> /usr/share/doc even when build in a different environment (basically,
>> both versions are fine here).
>
> Hello,
> It is quite important. If the shared files are not binary id
Olе Streicher wrote:
> for some of my newly uploaded packages, I got a bug report
> 'arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package' [1]. The files in
> question are in /usr/share/doc/.
> However, these differences do not come from differences in the
> ar
Hi,
for some of my newly uploaded packages, I got a bug report
'arch-dependent files in "Multi-Arch: same" package' [1]. The files in
question are in /usr/share/doc/.
However, these differences do not come from differences in the
architecture but from different build enviro
5 matches
Mail list logo
