On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 7:48 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote:
>
> In any case, I was not so much asking for help building/reproducing,
> as I was asking what I can do other than to reply to the bug, which
> seems not to be eliciting a response, to either avoid or delay the
> auto-removal process. Is aut
Thanks for the responses and attempts to build!
Yes, it takes quite a bit of memory unfortunately, due to some very
large auto-generated swig wrappers combined with some complicated
boost usage.
In any case, I was not so much asking for help building/reproducing,
as I was asking what I can do othe
I used a trivial jail with chroot. I can't reproduce the issue.
Regards,
Eriberto
Em qui., 29 de abr. de 2021 às 18:30, Tobias Frost escreveu:
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> > Hi Mentors,
> >
> > My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 05:25:28PM +0200, Stephen Sinclair wrote:
> Hi Mentors,
>
> My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has been marked
> for autoremoval from testing.
> The problem is that I cannot reproduce it. The failure is on a test
> that depends on another package, so I
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 5:26 PM Stephen Sinclair wrote:
>
> Hi Mentors,
>
> My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has been marked
> for autoremoval from testing.
>
> The problem is that I cannot reproduce it.
Did you build the package in a clean environment? Against on
Hi Mentors,
My package siconos currently has a bug filed [1] and has been marked
for autoremoval from testing.
The problem is that I cannot reproduce it. The failure is on a test
that depends on another package, so I am wondering if there was just a
glitch here? I have replied to the bug report
6 matches
Mail list logo
