Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Stefano, On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 04:59:06PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:28:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > You can call auto* BEFORE you package it, and add the proper touch stuff in > > debian/rules to take care of the timestamp skew caused by

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason not to. yes, I need to call auto* because the sources are from a c

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:28:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > You can call auto* BEFORE you package it, and add the proper touch stuff in > debian/rules to take care of the timestamp skew caused by the diff. > > This way, autobuilders and Debian users do not neet to run auto*, and

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Stefano, On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 04:59:06PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:28:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > You can call auto* BEFORE you package it, and add the proper touch stuff in > > debian/rules to take care of the timestamp skew caused by

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > > not to. > > yes, I need to call auto*

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: >On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > >>Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the >>generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason >>not to. >> >yes, I need to call auto* because the sources are

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > > not to. > yes,

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:28:34PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > You can call auto* BEFORE you package it, and add the proper touch stuff in > debian/rules to take care of the timestamp skew caused by the diff. > > This way, autobuilders and Debian users do not neet to run auto*, an

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > not to. yes, I need to call auto* because the sources are from a cvs repository on which the

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Until now, I call all this tools before doing the debian package so that > all the generated files will be included in the .diff.gz, seems to me > that this idea is not so elegant. Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Sun, 25 Nov 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > > not to. > > yes, I need to call auto

build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
generated files will be included in the .diff.gz, seems to me that this idea is not so elegant. May I build depends on auto{conf,make} or is a deprecated idea? TIA, Cheers. -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863 Home Page: http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro Undergra

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:56:26PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > > not to. > yes,

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 01:29:18PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally packages just use the > generated files upstream provides unless there's some particular reason > not to. yes, I need to call auto* because the sources are from a cvs repository on which th

Re: build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Until now, I call all this tools before doing the debian package so that > all the generated files will be included in the .diff.gz, seems to me > that this idea is not so elegant. Do you actually need to call auto*? Normally

build depends on auto{conf,make}

2001-11-25 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
generated files will be included in the .diff.gz, seems to me that this idea is not so elegant. May I build depends on auto{conf,make} or is a deprecated idea? TIA, Cheers. -- Stefano "Zack" Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ# 33538863 Home Page: http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro Under