Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They are not (any more), with the caveat you can override it using
a -m option
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 07:30:53PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They are not (any more), with the caveat you can override it using
a -m option
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 12:05:16PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Colin Watson wrote:
If this is your only rationale, it is spurious, as you're talking about
Maintainer: in debian/control while I'm talking about Maintainer: in the
.changes file. The two are *distinct*.
They
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake
forth:
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's correct. My
I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin particular, when sponsoring a package, which field in the
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try -e...
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:29:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Is the correct way to build a sponsored package with just
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
eg -mHamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] to dpkg-buildpackage
or debuild?
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:20:20PM -0700, Mike Markley wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 11:06:32AM -0500, Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
spake forth:
I get Changed-By: the sponsoree, and Maintainer: me in the
.changes file as a result. That seems backwards.
I think that's correct. My
I think that's Maintainer: in the control file (and the .dsc). It makes
sense to me that the maintainer of a .dsc is the person primarily
responsible for the package, while the maintainer of a .changes is the
person responsible for uploading this particular build. This also
The Maintainer
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg developers (Wichert, Adam etc) intended with the new field?
Hamish
--
On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:40:46AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:40:29PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
However, I can see we aren't going to get anywhere with argument by
repeated assertion. :)
Do we need to take this to debian-devel, and find out what the
dpkg
Colin == Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Colin I think that would be appropriate.
Colin Exactly what are the intended semantics of Maintainer: and
Colin Changed-By: in the .changes file (not the .dsc)? In
Colin particular, when sponsoring a package, which field in the
22 matches
Mail list logo
