Thanks a lot everyone =D
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
Dear all
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
(Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
and new upgrade to must)
Eg.
foobar (1.5.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
[ Joe Plow Mber ]
* New upstream release
[ Vasja Pupkin
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:06:23 +0100
Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear all
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
Yes.
(Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
and new upgrade to must)
The important
Neil Williams a écrit :
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
Yes.
And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
--
Stéphane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Dmitrijs Ledkovs dmitrij.led...@gmail.com writes:
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
(Asking because of the explicit statement of one type of changlelog
and new upgrade to must)
That type of changelog allows anything at all following the two
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:22:49PM +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Neil Williams a écrit :
Is it still allowed as per 3.8.1 policy to use multi maintainer style
changelogs?
Yes.
And what was the prevous style of changelog allowed, by the way?
Originally, the debian changelog format was
6 matches
Mail list logo