Hi all!
I am trying to dive head first into the world of Debian development. As
such, this is my first post to any developer-related mailing list. I
thought the mentor list would be appropriate, as I probably need a
little more hand-holding than the normal development lists are meant to
provide. I
Hi all!
I am trying to dive head first into the world of Debian development. As
such, this is my first post to any developer-related mailing list. I
thought the mentor list would be appropriate, as I probably need a
little more hand-holding than the normal development lists are meant to
provide. I
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote:
> 1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay?
If it's standard artistic, then yes.
> 2. Is there any interest for such a package?
>From the incredibly long list of "Packages of Dubious Interest" (which I
can't find now, but which was very funny when
A few months back, I attempted to package TinyMUSH 3.0, but ran into some
trouble with a few clauses that seemed to imply something wasn't quite DFSG
free. I had submitted a report to the developers, and they expressed
interest in making it compliant. I haven't really done much with the package
sin
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:01:12AM -0500, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> A few months back, I attempted to package TinyMUSH 3.0, but ran into some
> trouble with a few clauses that seemed to imply something wasn't quite DFSG
> free. I had submitted a report to the developers, and they expressed
> interest
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote:
> 1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay?
If it's standard artistic, then yes.
> 2. Is there any interest for such a package?
>From the incredibly long list of "Packages of Dubious Interest" (which I
can't find now, but which was very funny when
A few months back, I attempted to package TinyMUSH 3.0, but ran into some
trouble with a few clauses that seemed to imply something wasn't quite DFSG
free. I had submitted a report to the developers, and they expressed
interest in making it compliant. I haven't really done much with the package
sin
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:01:12AM -0500, Jon Eisenstein wrote:
> A few months back, I attempted to package TinyMUSH 3.0, but ran into some
> trouble with a few clauses that seemed to imply something wasn't quite DFSG
> free. I had submitted a report to the developers, and they expressed
> interest
8 matches
Mail list logo
