Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>
> Why call it vdk_0_5_1.orig.tar.gz ?
>
> Maybe I'm out to lunch here. Here's what I do with packages and
> seems to me it works:
>
> $ mv vdk_0_5_1.tar.gz vdk_0.5.1-19990122.orig.tar.gz
> $ tar zxvf vdk_0.5.1-19990122.orig.tar.gz
> $ cd VDK-0.5.1
> $ deb-make (or wha
Hi,
>>"Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
>> Peter is correct. Just a small note: it is VERY important that the
>> .orig.tar.gz IS the original tar.gz (the name doesn't matter);
Chris> Hmm, I note that the cvs-buildpackage package creates a n
On Sat, Jan 30, 1999 at 10:58:51AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote:
> Hmm, I note that the cvs-buildpackage package creates a new .orig.tar.gz
> file. If it were *that* important, surely this standard debian tool
> would have a way to deal with the issue?
cvs-buildpackage is anything but standard. Yes
Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> Peter is correct. Just a small note: it is VERY important that the
> .orig.tar.gz IS the original tar.gz (the name doesn't matter);
Hmm, I note that the cvs-buildpackage package creates a new .orig.tar.gz
file. If it were *that* important, surely this standard debia
On 29 Jan 1999, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Anything special to do if it is impossible to use pristine sources?
>
> I have a packages where the source is distributed i zipfiles with only
> one-case 8.3 filenames (yuck). Everything in the sources uses
> filenames which differs in case. what shall I do?
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 04:56:52PM +0100, Peter Makholm wrote:
> I have a packages where the source is distributed i zipfiles with only
> one-case 8.3 filenames (yuck). Everything in the sources uses
> filenames which differs in case. what shall I do?
Ugh...
What exactly is this package? zip doe
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter is correct. Just a small note: it is VERY important that the
> .orig.tar.gz IS the original tar.gz (the name doesn't matter); if it can't
> be done[1], then it can't, but if you can use pristine source, please do use
Anything special to d
On Fri, Jan 29, 1999 at 10:55:36AM +0900, Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> Beside these changed names, the vdk-0.5.1.orig.tar.gz is identical with
> the original archive and I get just one warning from lintian (for the
> way I format the Description text).
Peter is correct. Just a small note: it is VERY
Ionutz Borcoman wrote:
> The original archive is vdk_0_5_1.tar.gz with a top directory VDK-0.5.1.
>
> The current version of vdk is a developement version and I've decided to
> call it: vdk-0.5.1-19990122 (using the release day of the library).
> Building the package, I get a tar.gz called vdk-0
Hi,
I am trying to package vdk-0.5.1 but I have some problems.
The original archive is vdk_0_5_1.tar.gz with a top directory VDK-0.5.1.
The current version of vdk is a developement version and I've decided to
call it: vdk-0.5.1-19990122 (using the release day of the library).
Building the packag
10 matches
Mail list logo
