On 14/05/12 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>>
>>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>>
> I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members
Le Tue, May 15, 2012 at 01:09:32AM +0200, Arno Töll a écrit :
> On 15.05.2012 00:26, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > when the NEW queue is long, this leaves us some time to make a pre-review to
> > ease the work of the FTP team, by reducing the number of errors they have to
> > deal with.
>
> how would
On 15.05.2012 00:26, Charles Plessy wrote:
> when the NEW queue is long, this leaves us some time to make a pre-review to
> ease the work of the FTP team, by reducing the number of errors they have to
> deal with.
how would you do that, given packages in NEW aren't publicly accessible
on purpose?
Le Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:49:41PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
> >
> >http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> I'd rather see a correlation to the fa
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:57:42AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
I'd rather see a correlation to the fact that some members of the
ftpmaster team might be short in time for private
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Is wheezy now frozen already? Are people just wasting their time
> preparing packages that are going to be passed over?
FYI the release team just narrowed the freeze date to the second half of June:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-ann
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 07:00:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> For the last few freezes, the release team accepted packages uploaded
> to unstable before the freeze into testing. No idea if they will do
> that again, but I imagine they will.
I thought this was a concession for the last freeze, becau
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Can you elaborate on that a little? The link you provided below doesn't
> explain the status of NEW - but Google found various things suggesting
> that Debian stopped accepting new packages before squeeze was released.
NEW is not managed by
On 12/05/12 10:07, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>>
>> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
> Freezes and NEW are mostly unrelated.
>
Can you elaborate on that a little?
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:57 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Freezes and NEW are mostly unrelated.
> Is wheezy now frozen already?
No
> Are people just wasting their time preparing pac
I notice that packages have not been taken from the queue for 3 weeks:
http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
Is wheezy now frozen already? Are people just wasting their time
preparing packages that are going to be passed over?
There is no official statement about this on the mentors site o
11 matches
Mail list logo