Re: karmic whois versus lucid mkpasswd

2010-07-04 Thread Ignacio Valdes
So I changed the filename and the version number in the .deb itself but I am still getting the same message as below. I read the fine manual on reprepro and this should be allowed but it doesn't seem to work. Now what? I would rather not rename the package itself inside the control file just for

Re: karmic whois versus lucid mkpasswd

2010-07-04 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Take that back, I thought I was changing the version number. It seems to work now. Thanks! -- IV On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Ignacio Valdes ival...@hal-pc.org wrote: So I changed the filename and the version number in the .deb itself but I am still getting the same message as below. I read

karmic whois versus lucid mkpasswd

2010-07-02 Thread Ignacio Valdes
Hi, The Astronaut package has a dependency on the mkpasswd command which was in the whois package in Karmic and is now in the mkpasswd package in Lucid. How does one make this work for apt-get using reprepro pool? When I reprepro includedeb karmic astronaut-common.deb with the whois package

Re: karmic whois versus lucid mkpasswd

2010-07-02 Thread Ignacio Valdes
I tried doing the adding ~karmic and ~lucid to the filename with the control contents changed to whois and mkpasswd respectively but I am getting this after adding the ~lucid astronaut-common file: [r...@labtest1 deb]# reprepro includedeb karmic karmic/*.deb ERROR: