Re: lib sdl

2002-05-01 Thread Jérôme Marant
Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining permission

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Andrea Mennucc
hi On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; ... Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on reinventing packaging that has already been done by

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: What Christian Marillat has been doing was surely done with good intentions in mind; and indeed I have already asked him for any help he wishes to provide; but there were some problems/issues. (btw: didn't you ask yourself

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Andrea Mennucc
it seems we have very different opinions; for me... ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where) ... upstream authors should be listened to (after all, they do most of the job), and ... courtesy is not an option (at

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Florent Rougon
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where) And? Nobody said the contrary. Jérôme simply said that software that can't be distributed is non-free software, which is (was?) the

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining permission is just a matter of courtesy. Pot. Kettle.

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Christian Marillat
Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread David Caldwell
On 05/01/02 03:36:11 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote: Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pot. Kettle. Black. Can you translate ? http://www.goenglish.com/2014.asp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Andrea Mennucc
hi On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 04:52:59PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; ... Sorry, but I don't really understand why you are working on reinventing packaging that has already been done by

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:35:26PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: What Christian Marillat has been doing was surely done with good intentions in mind; and indeed I have already asked him for any help he wishes to provide; but there were some problems/issues. (btw: didn't you ask yourself

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Andrea Mennucc
it seems we have very different opinions; for me... ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where) ... upstream authors should be listened to (after all, they do most of the job), and ... courtesy is not an option (at

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Jérôme Marant
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 02:25:35PM +0200, Andrea Mennucc wrote: It seems you have different ideas; I am not losing my sleep on this. Don't worry, I know who I'm talking to ;-) -- Jérôme Marant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Florent Rougon
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... there is non-free-software that can be distributed, and non-free-sw that cannot be distributed (regardless of where) And? Nobody said the contrary. Jérôme simply said that software that can't be distributed is non-free software, which is (was?) the

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Robert Bihlmeyer
Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining permission is just a matter of courtesy. Pot. Kettle.

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread Christian Marillat
Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You don't seem to have understood what cooperative work means. In another mail, Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what? The one who uploads the first wins. [...] Obtaining

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-30 Thread David Caldwell
On 05/01/02 03:36:11 +0200 Christian Marillat wrote: Robbe == Robert Bihlmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Pot. Kettle. Black. Can you translate ? http://www.goenglish.com/2014.asp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL

lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Andrea Mennucc
hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in Depends and Build-depends fields. thanks a.

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Julien LEMOINE
On Saturday 27 April 2002 16:32, Andrea Mennucc wrote: I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Christian Marillat
JM == Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no

lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Andrea Mennucc
hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in Depends and Build-depends fields. thanks a.

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Jérôme Marant
Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no libsdl1.2debian-dev, so I don't understand what we should put in

Re: lib sdl

2002-04-27 Thread Christian Marillat
JM == Jérôme Marant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Andrea Mennucc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: hi I am helping packaging mplayer; it depends on libsdl; I see that there is a libsdl1.2debian* series, and I heard that this is the best to be used in Debian; problem is, there is no