Re: libcpufreq and the small libsysfs transition

2006-02-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:47:11PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:19:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the > > > libsysfs transitio

Re: libcpufreq and the small libsysfs transition

2006-02-15 Thread Mattia Dongili
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:19:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > > I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the > > libsysfs transition. > > Facts: > > - current cpufrequtils is compatible with both libsy

Re: libcpufreq and the small libsysfs transition

2006-02-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote: > I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the > libsysfs transition. > Facts: > - current cpufrequtils is compatible with both libsysfs1 and libsysfs2 > - the source package depends on libsysfs-dev >= 1.0.0 >

libcpufreq and the small libsysfs transition

2006-02-12 Thread Mattia Dongili
Hello, I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the libsysfs transition. Facts: - current cpufrequtils is compatible with both libsysfs1 and libsysfs2 - the source package depends on libsysfs-dev >= 1.0.0 - libcpufreq0 uses ${shlibs:Depends} to build dependencies Now, my