Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-11 Thread Carlo Wood
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 01:45:06PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > - No application (or library) is linked against libcwd > > and then distributed: there will never exist > > (binary) packages that link against libcwd. > > If nothing links against a library ever, then there's no point in > dis

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-11 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Carlo Wood wrote: > As is described in > /libpkg-guide.html > a shared library should exist of two (binary) packages: > libfooX and libfoo-dev. > > However, the argumentation of that rule is based > on the assumption that there exist other packages > that link against those li

libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-11 Thread Carlo Wood
Hello all, I'm the author of libcwd. In the past Martin Krafft has been the debian maintainer of this package. However, he stopped using it and the version on debian is lagging a bit. In the meantime, I started to use debian myself, and I added amd64 support to libcwd - all the more reason to upgr

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-09 Thread Carlo Wood
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:26:15PM +, Cord Beermann wrote: > i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our dropboxes, so > if it happens again, that mail from you doesn't go through to a list, > check with the Listarchive and if it isn't there after two hours, send > us a message: >

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-09 Thread Cord Beermann
Hallo! Du (Carlo Wood) hast geschrieben: [ftr again: the outburst of spam yesterday happened accidently and should be fixed now.] > I still don't understand why my mail disappeared though, it > doesn't contain anything NEAR spammy content. i can't find anything containing your mailadress in our

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-09 Thread Carlo Wood
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 09:56:43PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hopefully things will get better. Hard moderations rules are quite > inconvenient anyway (like you have one or two questions to ask on a > list, and have to temporary subscribe, instead of setting > Reply-To/asking people to keep yo

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-09 Thread Cyril Brulebois
On 09/01/2008, Carlo Wood wrote: > My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost... The subject > was "libcwd: one or two packages?". The Message-ID was > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm "replying" to a local CC now). > Can someone tell me what is going on? Why d

Re: libcwd: one or two packages?

2008-01-09 Thread Carlo Wood
My mail, posted to this list on Jan 8, is ALSO lost... The subject was "libcwd: one or two packages?". The Message-ID was [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I'm "replying" to a local CC now). Can someone tell me what is going on? Why did both posts that I mailed to this list not app