Re: libfoo.so.X symlink not created at build time

2011-01-06 Thread Muammar El Khatib
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:41:40AM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: I think I have understood you. So, in this case I am showing I don't need the symlinks of type libfoo.so.X because the SONAME is itself the libfoo-x.y.z.so. yes. Thanks for confirming this. If you have

Re: libfoo.so.X symlink not created at build time

2011-01-05 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Muammar El Khatib muammarelkha...@gmail.com [110104 22:43]: Hi Bernhard, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Muammar El Khatib muammarelkha...@gmail.com [110104 16:52]: I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build time

Re: libfoo.so.X symlink not created at build time

2011-01-04 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Muammar El Khatib muammarelkha...@gmail.com [110104 16:52]: I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build time *.la, *.so (development symlink), and the library itself with the form libfoo-x.y.z.so but not their symlinks that match their SONAME (I was expecting

Re: libfoo.so.X symlink not created at build time

2011-01-04 Thread Muammar El Khatib
Hi Bernhard, On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:36:37PM +0100, Bernhard R. Link wrote: * Muammar El Khatib muammarelkha...@gmail.com [110104 16:52]: I'm maintaining a library which new upstream version is creating at build time *.la, *.so (development symlink), and the library itself with the