On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 09:59:53AM -0600, Gordon Sadler wrote:
The #PACKAGE# lines above are from the example scripts in
/usr/share/debhelper/dh_make/debian*/rules if you debianize a source
package by running dh_make, #PACKAGE# will be replaced with the package
name. If you just copy them
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Drew!
You wrote:
What is the appropriate way of bringing meschach into the 21st Century?
Are there any tools for handling this, or do the changes need to be made
manually?
You'll have to do it manually. The file
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:43:37AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
You'll have to do it manually. The file
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.text.gz contains all
chanes between subsequent policy versions. Using this
But when I run lintian on the changes file, it still whinges about no
symlink being setup for /usr/doc:
N: perl checks disabled temporarily
W: meschach: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: meschach: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
IANADD however it's been my recent experience with
Drew Parsons wrote:
Am I using the above scripts wrongly? Was I supposed to substitute the name
of the package instead of #PACKAGE# myself?
Yes!
Am I supposed to do something
to get the #DEBHELPER# line in postinst prerm to work properly? Is
#DEBHELPER# supposed to be there at all? (I
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
Hi Drew!
You wrote:
What is the appropriate way of bringing meschach into the 21st Century?
Are there any tools for handling this, or do the changes need to be made
manually?
You'll have to do it manually. The file
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 12:43:37AM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:58:14AM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
You'll have to do it manually. The file
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.text.gz contains all
chanes between subsequent policy versions. Using this
On 2001-01-11, Drew Parsons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was I supposed to substitute the name of the package instead of
#PACKAGE# myself?
Yes.
HTH,
--
Andreas Fuchs, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], antifuchs
Hail RMS! Hail Cthulhu! Hail Eris! All hail Discordia!
But when I run lintian on the changes file, it still whinges about no
symlink being setup for /usr/doc:
N: perl checks disabled temporarily
W: meschach: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-link
W: meschach: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
IANADD however it's been my recent experience with
Drew Parsons wrote:
Am I using the above scripts wrongly? Was I supposed to substitute the name
of the package instead of #PACKAGE# myself?
Yes!
Am I supposed to do something
to get the #DEBHELPER# line in postinst prerm to work properly? Is
#DEBHELPER# supposed to be there at all? (I
Hi Drew!
You wrote:
What is the appropriate way of bringing meschach into the 21st Century?
Are there any tools for handling this, or do the changes need to be made
manually?
You'll have to do it manually. The file
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.text.gz contains all
chanes
I'm adopting the meschach packages (you might recall I was asking about
compiling it the other week).
meschach was prepared under an old Debian policy (debian/control says
Standards-Version: 2.3.0.1 ), and debian/rules makes a few references to
usr/doc.
What is the appropriate way of bringing
Hi Drew!
You wrote:
What is the appropriate way of bringing meschach into the 21st Century?
Are there any tools for handling this, or do the changes need to be made
manually?
You'll have to do it manually. The file
/usr/share/doc/debian-policy/upgrading-checklist.text.gz contains all
chanes
13 matches
Mail list logo
