Re: motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]

2004-08-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:48:26AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels. I have

Re: motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]

2004-08-25 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 01:48:26AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: BTW, what is the deal with motion and 2.6 kernels ? I am under the understanding that it requires the videoloop or whatever module, which is not only abandoned upstream, but also not yet ported to 2.6 kernels. I have

motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]

2004-08-24 Thread Frederik Dannemare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 13:52, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13

motion, 2.6, and v4l loopback device [WAS Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)]

2004-08-24 Thread Frederik Dannemare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 20 August 2004 13:52, Sven Luther wrote: On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Aug 14, 2004 at 09:18:12AM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-14 Thread Frederik Dannemare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-14 Thread Frederik Dannemare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 14 August 2004 03:16, Wesley J Landaker wrote: On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-13 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really,

Re: motion - please do a sponsored upload for me (new revision with debconf fix)

2004-08-13 Thread Wesley J Landaker
On Friday 13 August 2004 19:06, Adam Majer wrote: Frederik Dannemare wrote: Hi, I was hoping that my previous sponsor of motion would have the time this week to do a new upload which has a couple of very small fixes, but unfortunately I haven't heard from him yet, so I'm really,