On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:02:55PM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>Please upload your package on mentors.debian.net and/or provide a link
>to your .dsc, [...]
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aafigure/aafigure_0.5-3.1.dsc
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Nathan Sunshine
wrote:
> I am interested in becoming a Debian Maintainer. I am willing to adopt
> python-aafigure (which is up for adoption) but the old maintainer is unable
> to mentor me. He suggested I ask here to see if anyone is up to the task. I
> am already
I am interested in becoming a Debian Maintainer. I am willing to adopt
python-aafigure (which is up for adoption) but the old maintainer is unable
to mentor me. He suggested I ask here to see if anyone is up to the task. I
am already familiar with Debian packaging.
--
"Super" Nathan Weber
-- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
It says that the package is orphan. Anyway it seams that package animals-game
is
better, so no problem, in any case I still need a mentor to maintain tuxeyes,
blackened, and gr
-- see
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed
instructions how to adopt a package properly.
It says that the package is orphan. Anyway it seams that package animals-game is
better, so no problem, in any case I still need a mentor to maintain tuxeyes,
blackened, and gr
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 02:45:01PM +, Luis de Bethencourt Guimera wrote:
> Hello:
> I have my gpg key signed by a DD and have made new versions of packages
> tuxeyes, blackened, animals, and groovycd to adopt them since they are
> in the orphan package list. I need a mentor t
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 02:45:01PM +, Luis de Bethencourt Guimera wrote:
> Hello:
> I have my gpg key signed by a DD and have made new versions of packages
> tuxeyes, blackened, animals, and groovycd to adopt them since they are
> in the orphan package list. I need a mentor t
Hello:
I have my gpg key signed by a DD and have made new versions of packages
tuxeyes, blackened, animals, and groovycd to adopt them since they are
in the orphan package list. I need a mentor to upload the packages, and
start being the official maintainer of them.
Thanks for the
Hello:
I have my gpg key signed by a DD and have made new versions of packages
tuxeyes, blackened, animals, and groovycd to adopt them since they are
in the orphan package list. I need a mentor to upload the packages, and
start being the official maintainer of them.
Thanks for the
Bob Proulx wrote:
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are s
Bob Proulx wrote:
John Lightsey wrote:
If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are stil
John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
John Lightsey wrote:
> If anyone with a non-x86 machine would like to take a look again and give
> feedback on wheter or not it compiles properly, I'd really appreciate it.
> The build logs that I recieved were very helpfull.
I grabbed that and gave it another run. There are still -O9
referenc
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
On Sunday 09 November 2003 05:27 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
...
>Those hard coded CFLAGS can't be disabled at configure time. On any
>architecture with optimizer sensitivities such as is often the case on
>less mature ports this can cause trouble.
>
>As help to convince upstream this is bad, refer them
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
> someone could download, build, and test
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:42:40PM -0600, John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
John Lightsey wrote:
> I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
> !x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
> but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
> someone could download, build, and test
I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
!x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
someone could download, build, and test this package I'd be very gra
I'm trying to adopt xmms-goom which has a release critical bug related to
!x86 architectures. I believe the version I've packaged fixes the problem,
but I don't have access to a !x86 machine running unstable to test it on. If
someone could download, build, and test this package I'd be very gra
21 matches
Mail list logo
