Re: package state after build

2005-10-17 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 10:44:00AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tommaso Moroni wrote: > > The knights package uses dpatch to correct some mistakes in > > po/de.po, thus generating a po/de.gmo which is different from the > > upstream source. Whi

Re: package state after build

2005-10-15 Thread Damyan Ivanov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tommaso Moroni wrote: > The knights package uses dpatch to correct some mistakes in po/de.po, > thus generating a po/de.gmo which is different from the upstream source. > While this doesn't affect the package build, a second build fails because of > u

package state after build

2005-10-14 Thread Tommaso Moroni
Hi! The knights package uses dpatch to correct some mistakes in po/de.po, thus generating a po/de.gmo which is different from the upstream source. While this doesn't affect the package build, a second build fails because of unrepresentable change to po/de.gmo. Should a package be rebuildable con