On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo?ɺc Minier wrote..
>
> I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> build your package, this is usually achieved by reading the
> upstream INSTALL file or better: the configure.ac/in. You can
> then derive the needed build-de
Hi,
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo???c Minier wrote..
> >
> > I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> > build your package, this is usually achieved by reading the
> > upstream INSTALL file or better: the configure.ac/in. You can
On Aug 6, Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo???c Minier wrote..
> > >
> > > I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> > > build your package, this is usually achieved by readin
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:12:45AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Aug 6, Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo???c Minier wrote..
> > > > I suggest you try understanding what the requirements are to
> > > > b
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 04:55:44AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote..
> Well, ironically enough, most of the answer is in the subject of
> this thread.
>
> The problem with AC_PATH_X is that it checks for a particular
> function which is provided by the Xt library, not by libX11. The
> fix for
On Aug 11, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:12:45AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > On Aug 6, Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:21:22PM +0200, Lo???c Minier wrote..
>
> > > > >
6 matches
Mail list logo
