Filippo Rusconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to the persons who have kindly answered my questions about the
> /etc/dir.d/ problem.
>
> At the beginning, the software did use the /usr/etc/dir.d
> configuration directory, but then the packaging system would complain
> that this i
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:13:21AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> in the software that I'm trying (gosh, that's not trivial...) to
> package, some configuration files are due to go in /etc/polyxmass.d
>
Configuration files are configuration files, not else.
If you need to rewrite
Hello,
Thanks to the persons who have kindly answered my questions about the
/etc/dir.d/ problem.
At the beginning, the software did use the /usr/etc/dir.d
configuration directory, but then the packaging system would complain
that this is not a standard location. I used this location because
that
Filippo Rusconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks to the persons who have kindly answered my questions about the
> /etc/dir.d/ problem.
>
> At the beginning, the software did use the /usr/etc/dir.d
> configuration directory, but then the packaging system would complain
> that this i
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:13:21AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> in the software that I'm trying (gosh, that's not trivial...) to
> package, some configuration files are due to go in /etc/polyxmass.d
>
Configuration files are configuration files, not else.
If you need to rewrite
On 2004-02-12 Filippo Rusconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I effectively get the said file in
> debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
> telling me that the "make install" target has worked ok.
> However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
> debian/polyxma
Hello,
Thanks to the persons who have kindly answered my questions about the
/etc/dir.d/ problem.
At the beginning, the software did use the /usr/etc/dir.d
configuration directory, but then the packaging system would complain
that this is not a standard location. I used this location because
that
On 2004-02-12 Filippo Rusconi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I effectively get the said file in
> debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
> telling me that the "make install" target has worked ok.
> However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
> debian/polyxma
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:13:21AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I effectively get the said file in
>
> debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
>
> telling me that the "make install" target has worked ok.
>
> However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
>
> debi
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 12:13:21AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I effectively get the said file in
>
> debian/polyxmassdata/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
>
> telling me that the "make install" target has worked ok.
>
> However, I also noticed that this file is referenced here:
>
> debi
Hello all,
in the software that I'm trying (gosh, that's not trivial...) to
package, some configuration files are due to go in /etc/polyxmass.d
For example, on file belonging to a "all type package, ie data-only"
should go like this:
/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
Now, when I try to packag
Hello all,
in the software that I'm trying (gosh, that's not trivial...) to
package, some configuration files are due to go in /etc/polyxmass.d
For example, on file belonging to a "all type package, ie data-only"
should go like this:
/etc/polyxmass.d/polyxmassdata.conf
Now, when I try to packag
12 matches
Mail list logo
