> Actually, you usually don't get these kind of warnings for Python extension
> modules. The warning is emitted only if a module has SONAME, and it
> typically doesn't.
>
> You might want to get rid of SONAMEs
That indeed was the problem. Thanks!
It's a CMake/SWIG build, and I now added a patch to
Jakub Wilk writes:
> Actually, you usually don't get these kind of warnings for Python
> extension modules. The warning is emitted only if a module has SONAME,
> and it typically doesn't.
If you build a module with libtool's -module flag, it looks like it still
gets an SONAME. I'm not sure why
* Russ Allbery , 2014-03-17, 19:12:
Understood, thanks!
I'll just ignore the warnings of the type
```
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/python-pytrilinos/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyTrilinos/NOX/_Abstract.so
contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyString_FromFormat: it's
probably a p
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Nico Schlömer
wrote:
> Understood, thanks!
>
> I'll just ignore the warnings of the type
> ```
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/python-pytrilinos/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyTrilinos/NOX/_Abstract.so
> contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyString
Nico Schlömer writes:
> Understood, thanks!
> I'll just ignore the warnings of the type
> ```
> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
> debian/python-pytrilinos/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyTrilinos/NOX/_Abstract.so
> contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyString_FromFormat: it's
> probably a pl
Understood, thanks!
I'll just ignore the warnings of the type
```
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning:
debian/python-pytrilinos/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/PyTrilinos/NOX/_Abstract.so
contains an unresolvable reference to symbol PyString_FromFormat: it's
probably a plugin.
```
then.
Cheers,
Nico
On Mon,
* Nico Schlömer , 2014-03-17, 15:49:
I'm building a package with Python support and would like to reduce the
number of warnings that dh_python2 gives me.
One of them is
public extension linked with libpython2.7
for a number of libraries. It is true that libpython2.7 is linked into
them,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> $ readelf -d /path/to/_ML.so
> [...]
> 0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libpython2.7.so.1.0]
> [...]
>
> but when I don't, builds with "-Wl,-no-undefined" will fail.
Well then do not use "-Wl,-no-undefined". You are
Hi all,
I'm building a package with Python support and would like to reduce
the number of warnings that dh_python2 gives me.
One of them is
public extension linked with libpython2.7
for a number of libraries. It is true that libpython2.7 is linked into them,
$ readelf -d /path/to/_ML.so
[..
9 matches
Mail list logo