Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote: http://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/radiotray/ at the moment the last line says: Last database update: Sat, 05 Jun 10 23:58:50 + I fixed it the other day (lock file was still around.) Next time please report it to debian...@lists.d.o as soon as it is two

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-14 Thread Elías Alejandro
Unrelated to the problem you're reporting, but a minor point: Your regex could be tighter (it's best to be as specific as feasible in a regex). I suggest:    http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.+)\.tar\.gz Ok, thanks people. -- Elías -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Elías Alejandro
Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- In debian/watch, processing watchfile line:

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me: Newest version on remote site is 0.5.1, local version is 0.6 =

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread José Manuel Santamaría Lema
On Domingo 13 Junio 2010 20:53:23 Christoph Egger escribió: Hi! Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: Hi all, I'm working with the new radiotray's version (http://sourceforge.net/projects/radiotray/files/) , it's new version 0.6, however doing: uscan --verbose it just show me:

Re: question about debian/watch

2010-06-13 Thread Ben Finney
Elías Alejandro eal...@gmail.com writes: as you see, my debian/watch is: version=3 http://sf.net/radiotray/radiotray-(.*)\.tar\.gz Unrelated to the problem you're reporting, but a minor point: Your regex could be tighter (it's best to be as specific as feasible in a regex). I suggest: