* Ghislain Vaillant , 2014-05-31, 10:16:
"apt-get install" would likely figure the correct order of debs.
However, "apt-get dist-upgrade" won't know how to upgrade the old
packages. So you probably need transitional packages:
https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package
A transitional package w
2014-05-30 20:51 GMT+01:00 Jakub Wilk :
> * Ghislain Vaillant , 2014-05-30, 15:45:
>
> Basically, if I install python-fftw3 and call `dpkg -i
>> python-pyfftw.deb`, then dpkg figures out the replacement, uninstall
>> python-fftw3 and configure and install python-pyfftw.
>>
>> If I install python-
* Ghislain Vaillant , 2014-05-30, 15:45:
Basically, if I install python-fftw3 and call `dpkg -i
python-pyfftw.deb`, then dpkg figures out the replacement, uninstall
python-fftw3 and configure and install python-pyfftw.
If I install python-fftw3-dbg, and python-fftw3 automatically as a
result
Maybe this is beyond dpkg's job and apt or aptitude would handle that just fine.
I suspect that's the issue: I don't think dpkg knows how to find
packages you didn't explicitly give it (sources.list is in /etc/apt, not
/etc/dpkg...), so if dependencies require other packages it will error
out
2014-05-30 14:37 GMT+01:00 Jakub Wilk :
> * Ghislain Vaillant , 2014-05-30, 09:44:
>
> Now say I want to rename the -foo suffix into -bar for both package
>> python-foo and python-foo-dbg. The debian developer's reference suggests to
>> Conflicts/Replaces/Provides the old name and change the name
* Ghislain Vaillant , 2014-05-30, 09:44:
Now say I want to rename the -foo suffix into -bar for both package
python-foo and python-foo-dbg. The debian developer's reference
suggests to Conflicts/Replaces/Provides the old name and change the
name of the package to the new name in the correspondi
Hi everyone,
I have posted my particular issue in the d-science list
( https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2014/05/msg00052.html ) but
thought it might be a better fit for here.
Basically, I have a python package foo, named python-foo and its debug
package python-foo-dbg, which version depend
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to r
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
> >> to provide seamless upgrades
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to r
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
>> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
>> depending on pcregrep, however rep
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 01:17:46PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> >> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
> >> to provide seamless upgrades
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
> depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives me a headache.
>
> Package: pcregrep
Hello,
I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts
with suggestions in policy.
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives m
On 2004-03-07 Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
>> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
>> depending on pcregrep, however rep
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:23:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
> to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
> depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives me a headache.
>
> Package: pcregrep
Hello,
I know this is a standard szenario, but the natural solution conflicts
with suggestions in policy.
When jumping from 4.3 to 4.5 I'd like to rename pgrep to pcregrep and
to provide seamless upgrades I'd introduce a dummy package pgrep
depending on pcregrep, however replaces/conflicts gives m
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:58:37 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:16:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [...]
>>> quoting a recent discussion on debian-devel:
---
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:16:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
>> quoting a recent discussion on debian-devel:
>>> -- From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[...]
>>> Mindless optimism. If yo
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 00:58:37 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:16:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> [...]
>>> quoting a recent discussion on debian-devel:
---
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:16:53PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
>> quoting a recent discussion on debian-devel:
>>> -- From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
[...]
>>> Mindless optimism. If yo
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:54:35PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is not a "standard" to make a package to disapp
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 10:03:11 +0200, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:54:35PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
>> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is not a "standard" to make a package to disapp
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:54:35PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
>>> something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: J
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:54:35PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
>>> something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: J
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
> > emacs-goodies-extra-el a dummy (empty) package which
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> > something you can do to ensure that "apt-get upgrade" works: Just make
> > emacs-goodies-extra-el a dummy (empty) package which
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, the fact that APT tries to not remove any of your currently
> installed packages during an upgrade.
kay, I was under the false impression this worked.
> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> something you can d
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe, the fact that APT tries to not remove any of your currently
> installed packages during an upgrade.
kay, I was under the false impression this worked.
> There is not a "standard" to make a package to disappear, but there is
> something you can d
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbug
Quoting Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the ordinary tools to upgrade the system are not enough to upgrade
> the system and the release notes are longer than that, I think it's a
> clear sign that we have made something wrong.
I think versioned provides would be a way to fix this by avoid
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbugs-el'
>-> replaced b
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I created a Packages.gz file to test the upgrade to these and added an
> entry to it to sources.list. Here's what happens:
>
> # apt-get -u dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... D
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 03:09:39PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbug
Hi all,
In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
the following to happen to these bianry packages:
`emacs-goodies-extra-el'
-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
`debbugs-el'
-> replaced by `debian-el'
I did the following in the control
Quoting Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If the ordinary tools to upgrade the system are not enough to upgrade
> the system and the release notes are longer than that, I think it's a
> clear sign that we have made something wrong.
I think versioned provides would be a way to fix this by avoid
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
> the following to happen to these bianry packages:
>
> `emacs-goodies-extra-el'
>-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
>
> `debbugs-el'
>-> replaced b
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I created a Packages.gz file to test the upgrade to these and added an
> entry to it to sources.list. Here's what happens:
>
> # apt-get -u dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Calculating Upgrade... D
Hi all,
In the upcoming version of the `emacs-goodies-el' source package, I want
the following to happen to these bianry packages:
`emacs-goodies-extra-el'
-> removed and contents merged into `emacs-goodies-el'
`debbugs-el'
-> replaced by `debian-el'
I did the following in the control
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:04:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > > > So in the control file, I
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:04:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > > > So in the control file,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:04:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and
> > > Replaces
> > > glutg
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:04:51AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> > > glutg3 for
This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the control file, I've speci
This one time, at band camp, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
>Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>I pref
This one time, at band camp, christophe barbé wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the c
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
>
>
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replace
This one time, at band camp, Santiago Vila wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the control file, I've spec
This one time, at band camp, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
>On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
>Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>I pre
This one time, at band camp, christophe barbé wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
>> I intend to rename the glut packages from
>> glutg3
>> glutg3-dev
>> to
>> libglut3
>> libglut-dev
>> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>>
>> So in the
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 11:24:16AM -0400, christophe barb? wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> > So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> > glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
>
>
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:04:07PM +1000, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replac
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not
> > the norm. libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev,
> > libglut4-dev, libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades
> > much
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not
> > the norm. libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev,
> > libglut4-dev, libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades
> > muc
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
> libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier.
Except that this means
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
> Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to rename the glut packages from
> > glutg3
> > glutg3-dev
> > to
> > libglut3
> > libglut-dev
> > to follow the convention for library package naming.
> I pr
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 16:34:54 +0200 (CEST),
Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> > I prefer libglut3-dev .
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 04:34:54PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> We should make versioned -dev (binary) packages the exception, not the norm.
> libglut-dev is better. Think about libglut3-dev, libglut4-dev,
> libglut5-dev etc. and how libglut-dev makes upgrades much easier.
Except that this means
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Deb
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
> Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I intend to rename the glut packages from
> > glutg3
> > glutg3-dev
> > to
> > libglut3
> > libglut-dev
> > to follow the convention for library package naming.
> I p
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> glutg3 for versio
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:04:07 +1000,
Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
I prefer libglut3-dev .
--
Oohara Yuuma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
De
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Jamie Wilkinson wrote:
> I intend to rename the glut packages from
> glutg3
> glutg3-dev
> to
> libglut3
> libglut-dev
> to follow the convention for library package naming.
>
> So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
> glutg3 for versi
I intend to rename the glut packages from
glutg3
glutg3-dev
to
libglut3
libglut-dev
to follow the convention for library package naming.
So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
that
I intend to rename the glut packages from
glutg3
glutg3-dev
to
libglut3
libglut-dev
to follow the convention for library package naming.
So in the control file, I've specified that libglut3 Conflicts and Replaces
glutg3 for versions <= 3.7-15, and created a glutg3 package with no content,
tha
Hi,
I would like to rename the source file (.orig.tar.gz) of
a package.
I'm thinking about:
- changing the source name in the control file
- changing the source name entries in the changelog
- filling a bug against ftp.debian.org since the pool entry
need to be renamed and proba
Hi,
I would like to rename the source file (.orig.tar.gz) of
a package.
I'm thinking about:
- changing the source name in the control file
- changing the source name entries in the changelog
- filling a bug against ftp.debian.org since the pool entry
need to be renamed and prob
71 matches
Mail list logo
