Re: should main package binary manpage be symlinked to package name?

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:29:08PM -0800, Number Six wrote: > If the main binary in a package is named "x" and the package is named > "x-package", should I ship > > (a) a manpage x.1 ? > (b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]? > > I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not > s

should main package binary manpage be symlinked to package name?

If the main binary in a package is named "x" and the package is named "x-package", should I ship (a) a manpage x.1 ? (b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]? I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not sure? If yes to (b), what section? Thanks

Re: should main package binary manpage be symlinked to package name?

On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:29:08PM -0800, Number Six wrote: > If the main binary in a package is named "x" and the package is named > "x-package", should I ship > > (a) a manpage x.1 ? > (b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]? > > I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not > s

should main package binary manpage be symlinked to package name?

If the main binary in a package is named "x" and the package is named "x-package", should I ship (a) a manpage x.1 ? (b) a manpage x-package.[1-9]? I'm pretty sure of (a). I think the answer to (b) is no, but I'm not sure? If yes to (b), what section? Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E