Russ Allbery a écrit :
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That was actually from linda, not lintian. ldd and objdump -x would
indeed be helpful to find the problem.
The linda warning about linking against a binary that you don't use
symbols from is very prone to false positives and
Hello,
As one of the SDL maintainers, I can confirm for you that the package
depending on libsdl1.2debian is completely okay. It is indeed a metapackage
which pulls in libsdl1.2debian-alsa by default (now), but can use others
(libsdl1.2debian-oss for example), as well.
You can simply override
As long as it includes a Depends: on libsdl1.2debian, it will be fine.
Lawrence
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 13:49, Le_Vert wrote:
Hello :-)
So I can just leave my package as it is, nothing more to do ?
Lawrence Williams a écrit :
Hello,
As one of the SDL maintainers, I can confirm for
Le mardi 25 avril 2006 à 11:20 +0800, Paul Wise a écrit :
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
spcaview : package review needed
The convention is RFC: package -- package description
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc
Best
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:09:34PM +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
Le mardi 25 avril 2006 ?? 11:20 +0800, Paul Wise a ??crit :
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
spcaview : package review needed
The convention is RFC: package -- package description
http://www.le-vert.net
On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 16:14 -0400, Justin Pryzby wrote:
I'm using dpatch right now, pretty nice, thanks :-)
FYI many people are now starting to use quilt.
For good reason, it rocks!
* debian/watch: please add one (read uscan(1) for more info)
Added. Looks great but is it usefull
Paul Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That was actually from linda, not lintian. ldd and objdump -x would
indeed be helpful to find the problem.
The linda warning about linking against a binary that you don't use
symbols from is very prone to false positives and often has to just be
ignored.
Hello,
Could you check this package before my sponsor upload it ? :
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.diff.gz
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote:
spcaview : package review needed
The convention is RFC: package -- package description
http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc
Best to just specify the dsc/diff so we can go dget -x url.dsc for a
more
Paul Wise wrote:
* debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or
0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their
version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch.
Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
-T
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On 25-Apr-2006, Ted Percival wrote:
Paul Wise wrote:
* debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or
0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their
version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch.
Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
11 matches
Mail list logo