Your message dated Fri, 30 Aug 2024 19:02:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1063884: fixed in python-autodocsumm 0.2.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1063884,
regarding RFS: python-autodocsumm/0.2.12-1 [ITP] -- API that automatically
extends sphinx (common documentation)
to be
Hello Marcos,
you seems to be quite unresponsive after you raised this ITP. At least
not vissible within the Debian BTS.
Are you still intrested in maintaining this package?
In the between time another person has interest in maintaining the
package within the DPT.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Hi,
I would like to sponsor your package if you consider maintaining it
under the Debian Python Team. I saw that you have already requested to
join the DPT. Until you get access to the DPT on Salsa, I can create a
repository for python-autodocsumm in DPT and provide you access.
Cheers!
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 00:02:45 -0300 marcosrcarvalh...@gmail.com wrote:
* Vcs :
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-autodocsum
The package source is not available in the git repo.
Please push and then ask for sponsoring on IRC channel #debian-python.
om/Chilipp/autodocsumm
* License : Apache-2.0
* Vcs :
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-autodocsum
Section : python
The source builds the following binary packages:
python3-autodocsumm - API that automatically extends sphinx
python-autodocsumm
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinx-wagtail-theme":
* Package name : sphinx-wagtail-theme
Version : 6.1.1-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/wagtail/sphinx-wagtail-theme
* URL
Your message dated Tue, 23 Aug 2022 16:13:41 +0200
with message-id <68825be5-2852-1aaf-9a16-d32861f40...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RE: Bug#1015168: RFS: sphinx-multiversion/0.2.4-1 [ITP] --
Sphinx extensionfor common documentation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1015168,
regardi
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hello Bastian!
All very well!
I've been a little busy. Hence the delay.
As you suggested,
I chose to package or binary separately.
I believe it's over
He follows:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sphinx-multiversion
Bug#1015169 - RFS: mir-eval/0.7-1
I also
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
I do not see any progress in the git repo.
Please fix the mentioned lintian messages before untagging moreinfo.
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
questions asked.
available: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/sphinx-multiversion
Nilson F. Silva
De: Bastian Germann
Enviado: domingo, 17 de julho de 2022 17:57
Para: 1015168-submit...@bugs.debian.org <1015168-sub
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 16 Jul 2022 23:41:01 + Nilson Silva
wrote:
sphinx-multiversion (0.2.4-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #1014666)
Please fix the following lintian messages:
W: python3-sphinx-multiversion: no-manual-page [usr/bin/sphinx
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinx-multiversion":
* Package name : sphinx-multiversion
Version : 0.2.4-1
Upstream Author : https://github.com/Holzhaus/sphinx-multiversion/iss
Your message dated Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:51:09 +0100
with message-id <734a5464-79ab-342d-8ebe-871f344e2...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: sphinx-sitemap/2.2.0-3 [ITP] -- Sphinx HTML extension
to generate sitemaps
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002735,
regarding RFS: sphinx-sitemap/2
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinx-sitemap":
* Package name : sphinx-sitemap
Version : 2.2.0-3
Upstream Author : Jared Dillard
* URL : https://github.com/jdillard/sphi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #955862
Ping. If someone could have a look...
--
Félix
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sphinx-autoapi", which is
needed for the newest version of khard.
* Package name : sphinx-autoapi
Version : 1.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Read the Docs,
Your message dated Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:27:23 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: kytos-sphinx-theme/0.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #915758,
regarding RFS: kytos-sphinx-theme/0.0.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: mike.gabr...@das-netzwerkteam.de
Hi,
Please **don't sponsor and upload** this package because my AM (Mike Gabriel)
will review it for me.
* Package name: kytos-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.0.1+dfsg-1
Upstream A
anged, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > [...]
> > diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
> > index a9d70b4..bd4c218 100755
> > --- a/debian/rules
> > +++ b/debian/rules
> > @@ -11,7 +11,13 @@ export LC_ALL
> > # docs are not generated without this ove
/rules
> index a9d70b4..bd4c218 100755
> --- a/debian/rules
> +++ b/debian/rules
> @@ -11,7 +11,13 @@ export LC_ALL
> # docs are not generated without this override
> override_dh_auto_build:
> dh_auto_build
> - PYTHONPATH=. sphinx-build -N -bman docs/ build/man # Man
only limits the search for documentation to that dir.:
>dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found
>
> > Is there generic Debian package maintainer advice that can be given –
> > specific thin
ion, and specifying a subdir
only limits the search for documentation to that dir.:
dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild
dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found
> Is there generic Debian package maintainer advice that can be given –
> specific things t
Chris Lamb writes:
> * You should probably avoid building the documentation too if the
>nodocs build profile is enabled.
For packages from PyPI which have documentation detectable by
‘dh_sphinxdoc’, does this (avoid building the documentation if the
“nodocs” build profile is enabled) just w
Your message dated Mon, 7 May 2018 14:25:13 +0200
with message-id <20180507122513.fhttcvvyi3kqo...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#897630: RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.5.1-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #897630,
regarding RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.5.1-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quark-sphinx-theme"
* Package name : quark-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author : Felix Krull
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/quark-sphinx-theme
Your message dated Wed, 15 Nov 2017 12:36:42 +0100
with message-id <20171115113640.qe3lupbucgfzd...@mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#863982: RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.0.4-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #863982,
regarding RFS: sphinx-autorun/1.1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
sphinx-autorun is now updated to 1.1.0-1 on mentors. Could someone have a look
to this package? I can't finish the packaging of todoman because of this build
dependency...
Thanks!
On 2017-07-25 18:45+0200, Félix Sipma wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Followup-For: Bug #86
Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #863982
I updated the package on mentors to 1.0.4-1.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (100, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quark-sphinx-theme"
* Package name : quark-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Felix Krull
* U
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for "sphinx-autorun":
sphinx-autorun - Code execution extension for Sphinx
Package name: sphinx-autorun
Version: 1.0.3-1
Upstream Author: Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
Homepage: https://github.com
>nice work, sponsored!
Great, thanks!
>
Your message dated Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:22:35 + (UTC)
with message-id <188903587.5737340.1476825755...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#841241: RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.4.0-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #841241,
regarding RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.4.0-1 [RC]
to be mar
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quark-sphinx-theme"
* Package name : quark-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.4.0-1
Upstream Author : Felix Krull
* URL : https://pypi.
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2016 11:10:31 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Uploaded nbsphinx
has caused the Debian Bug report #838870,
regarding RFS: nbsphinx/0.2.9+ds-1 [ITP] -- Jupyter Notebook Tools for Sphinx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello All,
On 07/10/16 15:44, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> Thanks Benoit for all the documentation work.
> The package looks good to me.
> Good catch for the audio link ; indeed lintian does not seem to handle
> element (I sent a patch : https://bugs.
Thanks Benoit for all the documentation work.
The package looks good to me.
Good catch for the audio link ; indeed lintian does not seem to handle
element (I sent a patch : https://bugs.debian.org/840009 )
As a side node, I'd advise you consider (report from check-all-the-things tool)
:
- adding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
On 05/10/16 13:26, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
> Thanks Benoit/Ghislain,
> indeed with experimental archive it's much better :)
>
> Benoit,
> my last point would be about privacy-breach-generic lintian.
> You overrided it with :
> --
> N: The in
Thanks Benoit/Ghislain,
indeed with experimental archive it's much better :)
Benoit,
my last point would be about privacy-breach-generic lintian.
You overrided it with :
--
N: The involved links are meant to illustrate URL examples, so it is meaningless
N: to bring the involved material in a local
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Frederic, thanks for your review,
On 03/10/16 14:55, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
>
> Hi Jerome,
>
> - d/control :
> * could you sort de dependencies : wrap-and-sort can help
done
> * by using github source tarball, you wouldn't have to d
Hi Fred,
On 03/10/16 14:55, Frederic Bonnard wrote:
Hi Jerome,
- d/control :
* could you sort de dependencies : wrap-and-sort can help
* by using github source tarball, you wouldn't have to deal with
suffix and get-orig-source stuff : nbsphinx.egg-info and setup.cfg are
already str
Hi Jerome,
- d/control :
* could you sort de dependencies : wrap-and-sort can help
* by using github source tarball, you wouldn't have to deal with
suffix and get-orig-source stuff : nbsphinx.egg-info and setup.cfg are
already stripped
- d/copyright : "There are many versions of the M
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package nbsphinx [0,1].
This package brings nbsphinx to Debian on behalf of the Debian
Python Modules Team. This is my second Debian Python Module package,
s
Hi
>22 days old (needed 5 days)
>Valid candidate
>
>
>So what might be the problem here?
wild guess, many packages have a dependency on the old version.
but they are arch:all, so binNMU isn't possible (or is, but nobody
wants to try them).
So, sourceful uploads are needed for reverse-
On 09/16/2016 10:01 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> So what might be the problem here?
The strict dependencies on sphinx in cdist-doc apparently.
>From the britney output:
Trying easy from autohinter: clustalo/1.2.3-1 sphinx/1.4.6-1
start: 57+556: a-3:i-18:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-0:p-35:p-0:s-1
Hi,
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=sphinx
says:
22 days old (needed 5 days)
Valid candidate
So what might be the problem here?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
>
> please try to use install_requires in setup.py for the sphinx dependency,
> avoding the runtime dependency and letting
> ${python*:Depends} add it automatically.
>
I actually already changed that upstream :)
Thanks for sponsoring!
Your message dated Sat, 13 Aug 2016 16:46:28 + (UTC)
with message-id <867278439.23397344.1471106788189.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834237: RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.3.2-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #834237,
regarding RFS: quark-sphinx-theme/0.3.2-
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "quark-sphinx-theme"
* Package name : quark-sphinx-theme
Version : 0.3.2-1
Upstream Author : Felix Kr
Sid within
Cowbuilder and the environment is set to "C". But here, several attempts
to change the build LC_LANG failed so far being effective for the Sphinx
build, and that error remains. I'll come back when I've got deeper into
that issue.
Greetings,
Daniel
--
http://www
Thanks guys for the hints. Yes indeed, I've checked the Sid within
Cowbuilder and the environment is set to "C". But here, several attempts
to change the build LC_LANG failed so far being effective for the Sphinx
build, and that error remains. I'll come back when I'
* Barry Warsaw [140724 17:41]:
> I don't remember the details, but I think there are some build
> environments where the locale is not set correct (or not set?),
> which can cause Python's default encodings to kick in and make
> incorrect assumptions (albeit based on limited available
> informatio
On Jul 24, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Daniel Stender wrote:
>I'm working on packaging a Python package with a Sphinx based documentation,
>Nltk 3.0.0b1, and there are encoding related build errors.
>...
>Strangely, this only occurs when trying to build against Sid (via
>Cowbuilder), b
Hi,
I'm working on packaging a Python package with a Sphinx based
documentation, Nltk 3.0.0b1, and there are encoding related build errors.
building [html]: targets for 28 source files that are out of date
updating environment: 28 added, 0 changed, 0 removed
reading sources... [ 3%
Hi mentors,
I have a package [1] that builds its doc using sphinx [2] and the
intersphinx extension [3].
Intersphinx attempts to download "objects.inv" files to generate links
to external documentation.
Packages should be self-contained so trying to access the net can be
considere
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:46:16AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I have uploaded a new Debian package to
vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.d
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 09:46:16AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I have uploaded a new Debian package to
vestein.arb-phys.uni-dortmund.
Yeah, cruise freshmeat.net there are always tons of cool things nobody
has packaged yet. Even just reading the last few days should help you
find something that _you_ find cool to package.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
>
> * Christ
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:11:20AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
Check the bugs against the wnpp package and see how big the list of orphaned
or up for adoption packages is :)
If you find something that is interesting for you, take it or talk to the
Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
* Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001001 11:10]:
>
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
>
> > Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
>
> Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
--
Scott Dier <[EMA
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
C
Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Maintainer is Ben Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and i dont see it in wnpp.
* Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001001 10:21]:
> I've got the beginnings of a netsaint package that I never finished, if
> you'd like it. It's not exact
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Figures :)
>
> Thanks. I should have checked first.
>
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I've got the beginnings of a netsai
Yeah, cruise freshmeat.net there are always tons of cool things nobody
has packaged yet. Even just reading the last few days should help you
find something that _you_ find cool to package.
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
>
> * Chris
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 11:11:20AM -0500, Scott Dier wrote:
> Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
Check the bugs against the wnpp package and see how big the list of orphaned
or up for adoption packages is :)
If you find something that is interesting for you, take it or talk to the
; On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
>
> > I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> > noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> > would be interested in packaging sphinx.
>
> If this is the sphinx that'
Anyone got another idea of something I can do? :)
* Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001001 11:10]:
>
> On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
>
> > Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
>
> Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
--
Scott Dier <[EM
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Oops...I missed that. Thanks for catching this :-)
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like theres allready a netsaint package in woody...
Maintainer is Ben Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and i dont see it in wnpp.
* Christopher C. Chimelis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001001 10:21]:
> I've got the beginnings of a netsaint package that I never finished, if
> you'd like it. It's not exac
On Sun, 1 Oct 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> Figures :)
>
> Thanks. I should have checked first.
>
> Well, my background right now is mostly systems administration and
> programming, anyone got a service or something console based that needs
> to be packaged? :)
I've got the beginnings of a netsa
; On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
>
> > I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> > noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> > would be interested in packaging sphinx.
>
> If this is the sphinx that'
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> would be interested in packaging sphinx.
If this is the sphinx that's a speech recogniti
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Scott Dier wrote:
> I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
> noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
> would be interested in packaging sphinx.
If this is the sphinx that's a speech recogniti
I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
would be interested in packaging sphinx.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ringworld.org/ finger:[EMAIL PRO
I am also interested in packaging. This would be my first package. If
noone comes out from before and jumps up and down about doing it, I
would be interested in packaging sphinx.
--
Scott Dier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> #nicnac@efnet
http://www.ringworld.org/ finger:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In January, you wrote:
> I'm sure many of you noticed the release of CMU's Speech to Text as 'Open
> Source' today on slashdot. after carefull inspection of the license, i found
> that it isn't exactly free. howerver, it's quite close, and uses gnu
> autoconf, so i decided that it surely needs to b
In January, you wrote:
> I'm sure many of you noticed the release of CMU's Speech to Text as 'Open
> Source' today on slashdot. after carefull inspection of the license, i found
> that it isn't exactly free. howerver, it's quite close, and uses gnu
> autoconf, so i decided that it surely needs to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:22:02PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> doh.
>
> i'd like to withdraw my foolish post from earlier this afternoon. i need to
> read more slowly.
>
> i wonder if anyone is still willing to sponsor me after that goof.
More than happy to.
Michael Beatt
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> > i was going by the Open Source Definition (www.opensource.org/osd.html). i
> > wonder why the debian definition is different.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 06:51:38PM -0500, Joe Drew wrote:
> the dfsg and the ossd are nearly exactly the sa
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> i was going by the Open Source Definition
> (www.opensource.org/osd.html). i wonder why the debian definition is
> different.
Because when the open-source definition was originally being defined
some changes were introduced so it would
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:16:40PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> i was going by the Open Source Definition (www.opensource.org/osd.html). i
> wonder why the debian definition is different.
the dfsg and the ossd are nearly exactly the same. In fact, upon perusing
the OSSD I came across the following:
doh.
i'd like to withdraw my foolish post from earlier this afternoon. i need to
read more slowly.
i wonder if anyone is still willing to sponsor me after that goof.
--
(jacob kuntz)[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED],underworld}.net
(megabite systems) "think free speec
i was going by the Open Source Definition (www.opensource.org/osd.html). i
wonder why the debian definition is different.
--
(jacob kuntz)[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED],underworld}.net
(megabite systems) "think free speech, not free beer." (gnu foundataion)
rt 4 of the Sphinx license:
* 4. Products derived from this software may not be called "Sphinx"
*nor may "Sphinx" appear in their names without prior written
*permission of Carnegie Mellon University. To obtain permission,
*contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks all right to me.
--
Raul
#x27;m not brimming with glee that we have access to it of course.
* 3. The names "Sphinx" and "Carnegie Mellon" must not be used to
*endorse or promote products derived from this software without
*prior written permission. To obtain permission, contact
*[EMAIL P
excuse me, i meant part 4 of the license. part 3 is fine.
--
(jacob kuntz)[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
PROTECTED],underworld}.net
(megabite systems) "think free speech, not free beer." (gnu foundataion)
Joe Drew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 05:28:02PM -0500, Jacob Kuntz wrote:
> > i'm sure many of you noticed the release of CMU's Speech to Text as 'Open
> > Source' today on slashdot. after carefull inspection of the license, i found
> > that it isn't exactly free.
>
> What
in
*the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
*distribution.
*
* 3. The names "Sphinx" and "Carnegie Mellon" must not be used to
*endorse or promote products derived from this software without
*prior written permission. To obtain permission,
i'm sure many of you noticed the release of CMU's Speech to Text as 'Open
Source' today on slashdot. after carefull inspection of the license, i found
that it isn't exactly free. howerver, it's quite close, and uses gnu
autoconf, so i decided that it surely needs to be brought to debian. ("hey
comp
88 matches
Mail list logo
