Hello,
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> Such is the case with my packages. Upstream does strip in the
> Makefile. Aside from editing the Makefile using dpatch, is there
> anything else that is easily done to correct this?
"Different strokes for different folks."
I got away with redefin
On Monday 13 August 2007 19:38:35 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Such is the case with my packages. Upstream does strip in the
> > Makefile. Aside from editing the Makefile using dpatch, is there
> > anything else that is easily done to correct this? I know this
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Such is the case with my packages. Upstream does strip in the
> Makefile. Aside from editing the Makefile using dpatch, is there
> anything else that is easily done to correct this? I know this seems
> straightforward, but I just wanted to ask before I st
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:14:23 -0400
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Recently I've had a bug filed against a few of my packages about
> final binaries being stripped even though DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip
> is set (in an autobuild process). The bug goes on to say that it
> could be that
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Recently I've had a bug filed against a few of my packages about
> final binaries being stripped even though DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip
> is set (in an autobuild process). The bug goes on to say that it
> could be that upstream is stripping the files.
>
>
Recently I've had a bug filed against a few of my packages about
final binaries being stripped even though DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip
is set (in an autobuild process). The bug goes on to say that it
could be that upstream is stripping the files.
Such is the case with my packages. Upstream does str
6 matches
Mail list logo
