pload (original source is included)
Now running lintian...
E: tesseract-ocr: missing-dependency-on-libc needed by
./usr/bin/cntraining and 4 others
Finished running lintian.
[...]
I assume that the gencontrol warning is connected to the missing
dependency. I have, though, got ${shlibs:Depends} in Depends,
On 29/04/2008, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> I assume that the gencontrol warning is connected to the missing
> dependency. I have, though, got ${shlibs:Depends} in Depends
What does dpkg --info on the binaries say? (pipe it into grep ^Depends)
> and I even tried manually adding libc too, all withou
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > and I even tried manually adding libc too, all without luck.
>
> DON'T DO THAT.
>
> There are libc6, libc6.1, libc0.1, and libc0.3 around. You don't want to
> hardcode it. Ever.
I figured as much, but wanted to see what I could do to change th
(List-reply is your friend, I don't need extra copies, thanks.)
On 29/04/2008, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> Ahhh. Thanks. Now it is lintian clean. But I have the following
> warnings. In another package, I fixed similar warning by setting
> LDLOADLIBS in rules. I could set LIBS here, except that
> /
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> You could try and use LDFLAGS to pass -Wl,--as-needed (linker flags).
> But since it could break silently some parts of your build, it shouldn't
> be used without -Wl,-z,defs which will help spot possible missing -l$foo
> options in intermediate objects (if any). You can p
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could try and use LDFLAGS to pass -Wl,--as-needed (linker flags).
> But since it could break silently some parts of your build, it shouldn't
> be used without -Wl,-z,defs which will help spot possible missing -l$foo
> options in intermediate
6 matches
Mail list logo
