On Thu, Jun 18, 1998 at 10:58:07AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> Eh? The use of .orig.tar.gz pre-dates the use of pristine source
> significantly. Often there is no way to make certain alterations to
> the upstream source other than to alter the .orig.tar.gz (i.e. if you
> want to mass-remove or a
"Marcelo E. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 06:51:11PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> > tmancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Put another way: "Am I going to mess up any of the automated
> > > scripts processing the archive if I make changes to the
> > > .ori
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 06:51:11PM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> tmancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Put another way: "Am I going to mess up any of the automated scripts
> > processing the archive if I make changes to the .orig.tar.gz without
> > giving it a new name?"
>
> No.
James is ri
tmancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Put another way: "Am I going to mess up any of the automated scripts
> processing the archive if I make changes to the .orig.tar.gz without
> giving it a new name?"
No.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~ http://yawn.nocrew.or
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 09:00:25AM -0400, tmancill wrote:
> This explains why dpkg did not complain when I added manpages. The file
> I'm trying to include is a binary file (of sorts - it's an extra version
> of the Sangoma firmware).
you can uuencode it, and make debian/rules uudecode it on bui
On 16 Jun 1998, James Troup wrote:
> dpkg-source handles (non-binary) inclusions fine; see 3.3 of the
> packaging manual.
This explains why dpkg did not complain when I added manpages. The file
I'm trying to include is a binary file (of sorts - it's an extra version
of the Sangoma firmware).
>
tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dpkg-buildsource does like it when I just add the files to my source
^^ "not", shurely?
> tree, I guess since there is nothing to diff them against.
dpkg-source handles (non-binary) inclusions fine; see 3.3 of the
packaging manual.
On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, tony mancill wrote:
> Should I upload a new .orig.tar.gz file? And if I do so, shouldn't I
> update the upstream version number? (Which is bordering on raw fiction,
> since no such upstream version exists.)
On the missing version number: IIRC it was at one time suggested
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (tony mancill) writes:
> I have been working with the authors of wanpipe and have some assorted
> goodies that I'd like to include into my Debian package. dpkg-buildsource
> does like it when I just add the files to my source tree, I guess since
> there is nothing to diff them a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I have been working with the authors of wanpipe and have some assorted
goodies that I'd like to include into my Debian package. dpkg-buildsource
does like it when I just add the files to my source tree, I guess since
there is nothing to diff them against.
Shou
10 matches
Mail list logo
